Top 8 Government Schemes For Startups In India

What is a Society?

A society is a non-profit organisation formed by a group of individuals who come together for charitable, literary, scientific, cultural, or educational purposes. Societies in India are governed by the Societies Registration Act, 1860, although many states have their own versions of the Act (e.g., Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, etc.).

A society must have:

• A minimum of seven members to register at the state level
• An elected governing body or managing committee
• A constitution or memorandum outlining its objectives and rules

Societies are known for their democratic structure, where members have voting rights and leadership is elected periodically.

When to Consider Forming a Society?

Forming a society may be your best option if:

• You prefer a democratically run organisation with an elected management committee
• Members may change frequently or seek easy exit options
• You want a relatively simple dissolution process
• You're operating within a state jurisdiction (or planning to expand nationally with additional registrations)
  
  

Societies are particularly suited for community-driven or volunteer-based initiatives, like resident welfare associations, cultural organisations, and grassroots education or health programs.

Meaning of Trusts

A trust is a legal arrangement under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 (or relevant state-specific Public Trusts Acts) in which a settlor (or author) transfers property or assets to one or more trustees, who hold and manage them for the benefit of specific beneficiaries.

Key roles in a trust:

• Author of the trust: The person who creates the trust and donates property
• Trustee: The person(s) responsible for managing the trust and fulfilling its objectives
• Beneficiary: The individual(s) or group for whom the trust is created

The central concept is the "beneficial interest"- the trustee has legal control of the asset, but the benefit goes to the beneficiaries. Trusts are often used in both private and public charitable contexts.

Want to register your organisation? Get expert help with Company registration — start your journey today with Razorpay Rize.

When and Why You Might Need a Trust?

You might choose a trust if:

• You want to retain long-term control without democratic elections or rotating leadership
• Your non-profit involves family members or a small, stable group of trustees
• You need privacy, minimal external regulation, or flexible distribution of benefits
• You plan to manage property, assets, or legacy donations

Trusts are ideal for schools, hospitals, orphanages, and religious institutions, especially when the focus is on asset management and continuity over generations.

Meaning of Section 8 Companies

A Section 8 Company is a special form of non-profit company registered under the Companies Act, 2013. It is incorporated to promote commerce, art, science, research, education, social welfare, religion, or charity.

Key features:

• It must apply for a license from the Central Government
• Its profits or income cannot be distributed as dividends
• All income must be used to promote the organisation’s objectives
• The name does not include “Limited” or “Private Limited”

Section 8 Companies are highly structured, professionally governed, and seen as credible entities both by donors and government bodies.

Reasons for Forming a Section 8 Company

You should consider registering for Section 8 Company if:

• You're looking for a formal and transparent governance model
• You want to build long-term partnerships with government bodies, corporates, or international NGOs
• You're applying for CSR funds, grants, or FCRA registration
• You want to project credibility and professionalism in your operations

Section 8 Companies are ideal for large-scale non-profits, social enterprises, or organisations planning to operate across India or internationally.

Difference Between Society, Trust, and Section 8 Company

All three structures, Trusts, Societies, and Section 8 Companies, are eligible for tax exemptions under Section 12A and 80G of the Income Tax Act. They also meet the definition of "charitable purpose" under Section 2(15).

But beyond this, they vary significantly in formation, governance, compliance, and scalability. Here’s a comparison at a glance:

Each structure, Trust, Society, or Section 8 Company, has its own strengths. The right choice depends on your mission, governance preferences, funding goals, and long-term vision.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Winding Up of a Company?

Winding up a company refers to the legal process of closing its operations permanently. It involves selling the company's assets, settling its debts and liabilities, and distributing any remaining surplus among shareholders according to their rights. Once the process is complete, the company is dissolved and ceases to exist as a legal entity. Winding up may be voluntary, initiated by members or creditors, or compulsory, ordered by a court.

The main reasons for winding up a company include:

• Ceasing the company's operations
• Collecting the company's assets
• Paying off the company's debts and liabilities
• Distributing any remaining assets to the members

The main reasons for winding up a company include:

• Inability to pay debts (insolvency)
• Completion of the purpose for which the company was formed
• Expiry of the period fixed for the duration of the company
• The passing of a special resolution by the members to wind up the company

Key Aspects of Winding Up of a Company

The winding up of a company involves several key aspects that need to be considered:

1.  Appointment of Liquidator

A liquidator is a person or entity responsible for managing the winding-up process of a company, including selling assets, settling liabilities, and distributing remaining funds to stakeholders. A liquidator is appointed to manage the winding up process. He is appointed by members or creditors in voluntary winding up or by the court in compulsory winding up. 

2.  Realisation of Assets

The liquidator takes possession of all the company's assets and realises them into cash. This may involve selling the company's property, plant and equipment, collecting debts from debtors, and recovering any unpaid capital from the contributors.

3.  Payment of Liabilities

The liquidator settles all the company's liabilities, including debts owed to creditors, outstanding taxes and employee dues. The order of priority for payment is fixed by law, with secured creditors being paid first, followed by unsecured creditors and members.

4. Distribution of Surplus

After settling all the liabilities, surplus assets are distributed among the members in proportion to their shareholding. Preference shareholders are paid first, including any arrears, as per their rights. Once their claims are fully settled, the remaining surplus is allocated to equity shareholders in proportion to their shareholding. This process adheres to the company’s articles and legal requirements, ensuring an equitable distribution.

5. Dissolution of Company

Once the winding up process is complete, the liquidator submits a final report to the Tribunal or the ROC. The Tribunal then orders the dissolution of the company, and its name is struck off from the register of companies.

Types of Winding Up

There are three main modes of winding up of a company under the Companies Act 2013:

1. Compulsory Winding Up of a Company (By the Tribunal)
2. Voluntary Winding Up of a Company

a) Members' Voluntary Winding Up

b) Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up

3. Winding Up Subject to the Supervision of the Tribunal

Let us discuss each of these types in detail.

1. Compulsory Winding Up (By the Court)

Compulsory winding up of a company is when a company is wound up by an order of a court or tribunal. This is also known as "winding up by the court". The court may order a company to be wound up on various grounds specified in Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956 (now governed by Chapter XX of the Companies Act, 2013).

Compulsory winding up of a company is initiated by a petition filed before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) by:

• The company itself
• The company's creditors
• The company's contributors
• The Registrar of Companies
• Any person authorised by the Central Government

The grounds for compulsory winding up include:

• Inability to pay debts
• Acting against the sovereignty and integrity of India
• Conducting affairs in a fraudulent manner
• Failure to file financial statements or annual returns for five consecutive years
• The Tribunal is of the opinion that it is just and equitable to wind up the company

If the NCLT is satisfied that a prima facie case for winding up is made out, it admits the petition, appoints an official liquidator and makes an order for winding up.

2. Voluntary winding up of a company

Voluntary winding up is when a company is wound up by its members or creditors without the intervention of a court or tribunal. Voluntary winding up is initiated by the company itself by passing a special resolution in a general meeting. There are two types of voluntary winding up:

1. Members' Voluntary Winding Up

This occurs when the company is solvent and can pay its debts in full. A declaration of solvency is made by a majority of the directors, stating that they have made an inquiry into the company's affairs and believe that the company has no debts or will be able to pay its debts in full within three years from the commencement of the winding up.

2.  Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: 

This occurs when the company is insolvent and unable to pay its debts in full. No declaration of solvency is made in this case. The creditors play a greater role in this type of winding up compared to a members' voluntary winding up.

In a voluntary winding up, the company appoints a liquidator in a general meeting to conduct the winding up proceedings.

3. Winding Up Subject to the Supervision of the Court

A voluntary winding up (whether members' or creditors') may be converted into a winding up by the Tribunal if the Tribunal is of the opinion that the company's affairs are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the public or the company.

In such cases, the Tribunal may order that the voluntary winding up shall continue but subject to the supervision of the Tribunal. The Tribunal may appoint an additional liquidator to conduct the winding up along with the liquidator appointed by the company.

Winding Up a Company Process

The procedure for winding up of a company in India depends on the mode of winding up. Here is a step-by-step procedure for compulsory winding up of a company in India and voluntary winding up:

The process of winding up of a company in India is complex and involves several legal formalities. It is advisable to seek the assistance of a professional (such as a company secretary or a lawyer) to ensure compliance with all the requirements.

Example of Winding up of a Company

One notable example of the winding up of a company in India is the case of Kingfisher Airlines Limited. Kingfisher Airlines was a prominent Indian airline that ceased operations in 2012 due to financial difficulties and mounting debts.

In 2016, the Karnataka High Court ordered the winding up of the company on a petition filed by the Airports Authority of India, which was one of the company's creditors. The court appointed an Official Liquidator to take charge of the company's assets and manage the winding up process.

The liquidator faced several challenges in the winding up process, including the recovery of dues from the company's debtors and the sale of its assets. The company had a fleet of aircraft and other assets, which had to be valued and sold to pay off the creditors.

One of the major issues in the winding up of Kingfisher Airlines was the recovery of dues from its promoter, Vijay Mallya. Mallya had given personal guarantees for some of the loans taken by the company, and the creditors sought to recover these dues from him. However, Mallya fled to the UK, and the Indian authorities have been trying to extradite him to face charges of fraud and money laundering.

The winding up process of Kingfisher Airlines is still ongoing, and the liquidator is working to realise the company's assets and settle its liabilities. The case highlights the challenges involved in the winding up of a large and complex company with multiple stakeholders and legal issues.

The Kingfisher Airlines case also underscores the importance of timely action by creditors in the event of default by a company. Many of the company's creditors, including banks and airports, had allowed the debts to accumulate for several years before initiating legal action. This delay made it more difficult to recover the dues and increased the losses for the creditors.

In conclusion, the winding up of Kingfisher Airlines is a cautionary tale for companies and creditors alike. It highlights the need for effective risk management, timely action in case of default, and the importance of following due process in the winding-up of a company.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the winding up is a legal process of  liquidating a company's assets, settling of liabilities and distributing surplus to its members. It is a complex process that requires careful planning and execution, and the guidance of professional advisors. 

There are three modes in winding up under companies act 2013: compulsory winding up by the Tribunal, voluntary winding up by the members or creditors and winding up under the Tribunal's supervision. 

These modes of winding up have specific requirements and procedures. Proper planning and professional guidance can help minimise the impact on stakeholders like creditors, employees and members, ensuring a smoother and compliant winding-up process.

Frequently Asked Questions

Understanding Auditor as Per Companies Act 2013

Under the Companies Act, 2013, an auditor is defined as a qualified professional appointed to examine and verify a company's financial statements and records. According to Section 139 of the Act, only an individual Chartered Accountant or a firm of Chartered Accountants registered under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, can be appointed as an auditor of a company. If the auditor is a firm, including a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), the majority of its partners practicing in India must be qualified Chartered Accountants.

The Act emphasizes the importance of auditor independence to ensure unbiased examination of financial records. An auditor must remain free from any financial interest in the company being audited and cannot have business relationships that might compromise their objectivity. This independence requirement is fundamental to maintaining the integrity of the audit process and ensuring that stakeholders receive reliable financial information.

The qualification criteria are stringent to ensure that only professionals with appropriate expertise and ethical standards undertake this crucial responsibility. The Companies Act specifically disqualifies certain individuals from being appointed as auditors, including employees of the company, those indebted to the company beyond a specified limit, and those holding securities in the company or its subsidiaries.

Role of an Auditor under Companies Act

An auditor performs several vital functions within the corporate governance framework as prescribed by the Companies Act, 2013. Their primary role includes:

• Examining the company's financial statements to ensure they provide a true and fair view of the financial position and performance.
  
• Verifying that proper books of account have been maintained by the company as required by law
  
• Assessing the effectiveness of internal financial controls and reporting any weaknesses
  
• Reporting instances of fraud, non-compliance with laws and regulations, or other material weaknesses observed during the audit process
  
• Ensuring that financial statements comply with accounting standards and relevant statutory requirements
  
• Providing an independent opinion on the financial health of the company to protect shareholder interests
  

The auditor's role extends beyond mere number checking; they serve as watchdogs who safeguard stakeholder interests by providing an objective assessment of the company's financial reporting. This independent oversight is crucial for maintaining transparency and building trust among investors, creditors, and other stakeholders.

Appointment of Auditor According to Companies Act, 2013

Section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013 outlines the comprehensive framework for the appointment of auditors. The process begins with the first auditor appointment, which must be completed by the Board of Directors within 30 days from the date of registration of the company. If the Board fails to appoint the first auditor within this timeframe, company members must make the appointment at an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) within 90 days.

The first auditor holds office until the conclusion of the company's first Annual General Meeting (AGM). At this first AGM, a subsequent auditor is appointed who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting until the conclusion of the sixth AGM. This effectively establishes a tenure of five consecutive years for the auditor appointment.

Before finalizing the appointment, companies must obtain written consent from the proposed auditor, along with a certificate stating that the appointment meets all conditions prescribed under the Act. Additionally, the company must inform the appointed auditor of their appointment and file the appropriate notice with the Registrar of Companies within 15 days of the meeting where the appointment was made.

{{company-reg-cta}}

Purpose of Appointment of Auditor

The appointment of a company auditor serves several critical purposes within the corporate governance framework. Primarily, auditors protect the interests of shareholders by providing an independent assessment of the company's financial position. They act as vigilant gatekeepers who examine the accounts maintained by directors and report on the company's true financial condition.

Independent auditors provide assurance to stakeholders that the financial statements presented by management accurately reflect the company's financial position and performance. This third-party verification builds confidence among investors, lenders, and regulatory authorities in the reliability of financial reporting.

Additionally, auditor appointments fulfill statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 2013, helping businesses maintain legal compliance. The audit process identifies potential areas of financial risk, inefficiency, or non-compliance, allowing management to address these issues proactively. Through their objective assessment, auditors contribute significantly to improved financial discipline and transparency, which ultimately strengthens corporate governance practices.

Documents Required for Auditors Appointment

For the proper appointment of an auditor, companies must ensure they have the following essential documents:

• Written consent from the proposed auditor agreeing to the appointment
  
• A certificate from the auditor confirming eligibility and compliance with all conditions specified under the Companies Act, 2013
• Board resolution recommending the auditor's appointment to shareholders
  
• Shareholder resolution approving the appointment of the auditor
  
• Form ADT-1 for filing notice of appointment with the Registrar of Companies
  
• Copy of the auditor's Chartered Accountant certification and practice certificate
  
• Declaration of independence from the auditor confirming no conflicts of interest
  
• Letter of engagement outlining the terms of the audit assignment and responsibilities
  

Procedure for the Appointment of Auditor

Eligibility Verification

The appointment process begins with verifying the eligibility of the proposed auditor. Only a practicing Chartered Accountant or a firm of Chartered Accountants can be appointed as an auditor. The company must ensure the auditor doesn't fall under any disqualification criteria specified in Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Obtaining Consent and Certificate

Before appointment, the company must obtain written consent from the proposed auditor. Additionally, the auditor must provide a certificate stating that the appointment complies with all conditions prescribed under the Act and Rules. This certificate should confirm that the auditor meets independence requirements and has no conflicts of interest that might compromise audit objectivity.

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors reviews the qualifications and credentials of potential auditors and passes a resolution recommending suitable candidates to shareholders. For the first auditor, the Board directly makes the appointment within 30 days of company registration.

Shareholder Approval

For subsequent auditors, the appointment requires approval from shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. The company includes the auditor appointment as an agenda item in the AGM notice, and shareholders vote on the resolution.

Filing Requirements

After appointment, the company must file Form ADT-1 with the Registrar of Companies within 15 days of the meeting where the appointment was made. This filing formally notifies regulatory authorities about the auditor appointment and includes details about the auditor's term and remuneration.

Communication to Auditor

The company must formally communicate the appointment to the auditor, specifying the tenure and terms of engagement. This communication establishes the official relationship between the company and its auditor for the designated period.

Guidelines for Appointment of Auditor for Different Types of Companies

The appointment process varies depending on the company type, as outlined below:

Changing the Auditor: Special Notice Requirements Under Companies Act

The Companies Act, 2013 establishes specific procedures when changing auditors to ensure transparency and protect auditor independence. A special notice is required in the following circumstances:

• When appointing someone other than the retiring auditor
  
• When explicitly deciding not to reappoint a retiring auditor
  
• When removing an auditor before the expiration of their term
  

The special notice requirement involves:

• Providing notice to the company at least 14 days before the general meeting
  
• The company must immediately forward a copy of this notice to the affected auditor
  
• The auditor has the right to make written representations to the company, which must be circulated to members
  
• The auditor is entitled to be heard at the meeting where the resolution is being considered
  

These provisions ensure that auditor changes are properly scrutinized and that auditors have an opportunity to address any concerns regarding their removal or non-reappointment. This process safeguards against arbitrary dismissals of auditors who may have discovered irregularities or disagreed with management on accounting treatments.

Rotation of an Auditor

The Companies Act, 2013 introduced mandatory auditor rotation to enhance auditor independence and audit quality. This requirement primarily applies to listed companies and certain classes of companies as specified under Section 139(2).

For individual auditors, the maximum term is one period of five consecutive years. For audit firms, the maximum term is two periods of five consecutive years each (totaling ten years). After completing the maximum term, there must be a cooling-off period of five years before the same auditor or audit firm can be reappointed.

Key aspects of auditor rotation include:

• Promotes auditor independence by preventing long-term relationships that might compromise objectivity
  
• Brings fresh perspectives to the audit process, potentially uncovering issues missed by previous auditors
  
• Enhances investor confidence in the integrity of financial statements
  
• Reduces the risk of familiarity threats between auditor and client
  

Companies must plan transitions carefully to ensure smooth handovers between outgoing and incoming auditors, maintaining audit quality throughout the process.

Re-Appointment of Retiring Auditor

A retiring auditor may be re-appointed at the Annual General Meeting provided:

• They are not disqualified for re-appointment under Section 141 of the Act
  
• They have not completed the maximum term allowed under rotation requirements
  
• They have not given notice in writing of their unwillingness to be re-appointed
  
• No special resolution has been passed appointing someone else or specifically providing that the retiring auditor shall not be re-appointed
  

The process for re-appointment typically involves:

• Board recommendation for re-appointment of the retiring auditor
  
• Obtaining fresh written consent and eligibility certificate from the auditor
  
• Placing the re-appointment resolution before shareholders at the AGM
  
• Filing the necessary forms with the Registrar after shareholder approval
  

It's important to note that the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 removed the requirement for annual ratification of auditor appointment by members at every AGM when the auditor is appointed for a five-year term.

Removal, Resignation and Replacement of an Auditor

The Companies Act provides specific provisions for handling auditor changes during their term:

• Removal before term completion: Requires special notice, Central Government approval, and a special resolution at a general meeting. The auditor must be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
  
• Resignation: An auditor may resign by filing Form ADT-3 with the company and the Registrar, stating reasons for resignation. For listed companies and certain other categories, the auditor must also file with the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
  
• Casual vacancy: If a vacancy arises due to resignation, the Board of Directors must fill it within 30 days. If the vacancy is due to any other reason, the Board fills it within 30 days, but the appointment must be approved by members at a general meeting within three months.
  
• Replacement procedure: When replacing an auditor, companies must follow due process including obtaining no objection certificates from the outgoing auditor and ensuring proper handover of relevant audit documents.
  

These provisions ensure that auditor changes are transparent, properly documented, and comply with regulatory requirements to maintain audit integrity and independence.

Conclusion

The appointment of an auditor represents a critical aspect of corporate governance under the Companies Act, 2013. By following the prescribed procedures for appointment, rotation, re-appointment, and removal, companies ensure compliance with legal requirements while strengthening financial transparency and accountability. The structured approach to auditor appointments-with specific provisions for different types of companies-helps maintain the independence and effectiveness of the audit function. Businesses must stay informed about these requirements and any legislative updates to ensure proper audit practices, as non-compliance can lead to penalties and reputational damage. Ultimately, a properly appointed independent auditor serves as a safeguard for stakeholder interests and contributes significantly to the overall integrity of corporate financial reporting.

Frequently Asked Questions