Corporate Identification Number (CIN) Explained: Importance, Usage and More

Understanding Auditor as Per Companies Act 2013

Under the Companies Act, 2013, an auditor is defined as a qualified professional appointed to examine and verify a company's financial statements and records. According to Section 139 of the Act, only an individual Chartered Accountant or a firm of Chartered Accountants registered under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, can be appointed as an auditor of a company. If the auditor is a firm, including a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), the majority of its partners practicing in India must be qualified Chartered Accountants.

The Act emphasizes the importance of auditor independence to ensure unbiased examination of financial records. An auditor must remain free from any financial interest in the company being audited and cannot have business relationships that might compromise their objectivity. This independence requirement is fundamental to maintaining the integrity of the audit process and ensuring that stakeholders receive reliable financial information.

The qualification criteria are stringent to ensure that only professionals with appropriate expertise and ethical standards undertake this crucial responsibility. The Companies Act specifically disqualifies certain individuals from being appointed as auditors, including employees of the company, those indebted to the company beyond a specified limit, and those holding securities in the company or its subsidiaries.

Role of an Auditor under Companies Act

An auditor performs several vital functions within the corporate governance framework as prescribed by the Companies Act, 2013. Their primary role includes:

• Examining the company's financial statements to ensure they provide a true and fair view of the financial position and performance.
  
• Verifying that proper books of account have been maintained by the company as required by law
  
• Assessing the effectiveness of internal financial controls and reporting any weaknesses
  
• Reporting instances of fraud, non-compliance with laws and regulations, or other material weaknesses observed during the audit process
  
• Ensuring that financial statements comply with accounting standards and relevant statutory requirements
  
• Providing an independent opinion on the financial health of the company to protect shareholder interests
  

The auditor's role extends beyond mere number checking; they serve as watchdogs who safeguard stakeholder interests by providing an objective assessment of the company's financial reporting. This independent oversight is crucial for maintaining transparency and building trust among investors, creditors, and other stakeholders.

Appointment of Auditor According to Companies Act, 2013

Section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013 outlines the comprehensive framework for the appointment of auditors. The process begins with the first auditor appointment, which must be completed by the Board of Directors within 30 days from the date of registration of the company. If the Board fails to appoint the first auditor within this timeframe, company members must make the appointment at an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) within 90 days.

The first auditor holds office until the conclusion of the company's first Annual General Meeting (AGM). At this first AGM, a subsequent auditor is appointed who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting until the conclusion of the sixth AGM. This effectively establishes a tenure of five consecutive years for the auditor appointment.

Before finalizing the appointment, companies must obtain written consent from the proposed auditor, along with a certificate stating that the appointment meets all conditions prescribed under the Act. Additionally, the company must inform the appointed auditor of their appointment and file the appropriate notice with the Registrar of Companies within 15 days of the meeting where the appointment was made.

{{company-reg-cta}}

Purpose of Appointment of Auditor

The appointment of a company auditor serves several critical purposes within the corporate governance framework. Primarily, auditors protect the interests of shareholders by providing an independent assessment of the company's financial position. They act as vigilant gatekeepers who examine the accounts maintained by directors and report on the company's true financial condition.

Independent auditors provide assurance to stakeholders that the financial statements presented by management accurately reflect the company's financial position and performance. This third-party verification builds confidence among investors, lenders, and regulatory authorities in the reliability of financial reporting.

Additionally, auditor appointments fulfill statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 2013, helping businesses maintain legal compliance. The audit process identifies potential areas of financial risk, inefficiency, or non-compliance, allowing management to address these issues proactively. Through their objective assessment, auditors contribute significantly to improved financial discipline and transparency, which ultimately strengthens corporate governance practices.

Documents Required for Auditors Appointment

For the proper appointment of an auditor, companies must ensure they have the following essential documents:

• Written consent from the proposed auditor agreeing to the appointment
  
• A certificate from the auditor confirming eligibility and compliance with all conditions specified under the Companies Act, 2013
• Board resolution recommending the auditor's appointment to shareholders
  
• Shareholder resolution approving the appointment of the auditor
  
• Form ADT-1 for filing notice of appointment with the Registrar of Companies
  
• Copy of the auditor's Chartered Accountant certification and practice certificate
  
• Declaration of independence from the auditor confirming no conflicts of interest
  
• Letter of engagement outlining the terms of the audit assignment and responsibilities
  

Procedure for the Appointment of Auditor

Eligibility Verification

The appointment process begins with verifying the eligibility of the proposed auditor. Only a practicing Chartered Accountant or a firm of Chartered Accountants can be appointed as an auditor. The company must ensure the auditor doesn't fall under any disqualification criteria specified in Section 141 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Obtaining Consent and Certificate

Before appointment, the company must obtain written consent from the proposed auditor. Additionally, the auditor must provide a certificate stating that the appointment complies with all conditions prescribed under the Act and Rules. This certificate should confirm that the auditor meets independence requirements and has no conflicts of interest that might compromise audit objectivity.

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors reviews the qualifications and credentials of potential auditors and passes a resolution recommending suitable candidates to shareholders. For the first auditor, the Board directly makes the appointment within 30 days of company registration.

Shareholder Approval

For subsequent auditors, the appointment requires approval from shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. The company includes the auditor appointment as an agenda item in the AGM notice, and shareholders vote on the resolution.

Filing Requirements

After appointment, the company must file Form ADT-1 with the Registrar of Companies within 15 days of the meeting where the appointment was made. This filing formally notifies regulatory authorities about the auditor appointment and includes details about the auditor's term and remuneration.

Communication to Auditor

The company must formally communicate the appointment to the auditor, specifying the tenure and terms of engagement. This communication establishes the official relationship between the company and its auditor for the designated period.

Guidelines for Appointment of Auditor for Different Types of Companies

The appointment process varies depending on the company type, as outlined below:

Changing the Auditor: Special Notice Requirements Under Companies Act

The Companies Act, 2013 establishes specific procedures when changing auditors to ensure transparency and protect auditor independence. A special notice is required in the following circumstances:

• When appointing someone other than the retiring auditor
  
• When explicitly deciding not to reappoint a retiring auditor
  
• When removing an auditor before the expiration of their term
  

The special notice requirement involves:

• Providing notice to the company at least 14 days before the general meeting
  
• The company must immediately forward a copy of this notice to the affected auditor
  
• The auditor has the right to make written representations to the company, which must be circulated to members
  
• The auditor is entitled to be heard at the meeting where the resolution is being considered
  

These provisions ensure that auditor changes are properly scrutinized and that auditors have an opportunity to address any concerns regarding their removal or non-reappointment. This process safeguards against arbitrary dismissals of auditors who may have discovered irregularities or disagreed with management on accounting treatments.

Rotation of an Auditor

The Companies Act, 2013 introduced mandatory auditor rotation to enhance auditor independence and audit quality. This requirement primarily applies to listed companies and certain classes of companies as specified under Section 139(2).

For individual auditors, the maximum term is one period of five consecutive years. For audit firms, the maximum term is two periods of five consecutive years each (totaling ten years). After completing the maximum term, there must be a cooling-off period of five years before the same auditor or audit firm can be reappointed.

Key aspects of auditor rotation include:

• Promotes auditor independence by preventing long-term relationships that might compromise objectivity
  
• Brings fresh perspectives to the audit process, potentially uncovering issues missed by previous auditors
  
• Enhances investor confidence in the integrity of financial statements
  
• Reduces the risk of familiarity threats between auditor and client
  

Companies must plan transitions carefully to ensure smooth handovers between outgoing and incoming auditors, maintaining audit quality throughout the process.

Re-Appointment of Retiring Auditor

A retiring auditor may be re-appointed at the Annual General Meeting provided:

• They are not disqualified for re-appointment under Section 141 of the Act
  
• They have not completed the maximum term allowed under rotation requirements
  
• They have not given notice in writing of their unwillingness to be re-appointed
  
• No special resolution has been passed appointing someone else or specifically providing that the retiring auditor shall not be re-appointed
  

The process for re-appointment typically involves:

• Board recommendation for re-appointment of the retiring auditor
  
• Obtaining fresh written consent and eligibility certificate from the auditor
  
• Placing the re-appointment resolution before shareholders at the AGM
  
• Filing the necessary forms with the Registrar after shareholder approval
  

It's important to note that the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 removed the requirement for annual ratification of auditor appointment by members at every AGM when the auditor is appointed for a five-year term.

Removal, Resignation and Replacement of an Auditor

The Companies Act provides specific provisions for handling auditor changes during their term:

• Removal before term completion: Requires special notice, Central Government approval, and a special resolution at a general meeting. The auditor must be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
  
• Resignation: An auditor may resign by filing Form ADT-3 with the company and the Registrar, stating reasons for resignation. For listed companies and certain other categories, the auditor must also file with the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
  
• Casual vacancy: If a vacancy arises due to resignation, the Board of Directors must fill it within 30 days. If the vacancy is due to any other reason, the Board fills it within 30 days, but the appointment must be approved by members at a general meeting within three months.
  
• Replacement procedure: When replacing an auditor, companies must follow due process including obtaining no objection certificates from the outgoing auditor and ensuring proper handover of relevant audit documents.
  

These provisions ensure that auditor changes are transparent, properly documented, and comply with regulatory requirements to maintain audit integrity and independence.

Conclusion

The appointment of an auditor represents a critical aspect of corporate governance under the Companies Act, 2013. By following the prescribed procedures for appointment, rotation, re-appointment, and removal, companies ensure compliance with legal requirements while strengthening financial transparency and accountability. The structured approach to auditor appointments-with specific provisions for different types of companies-helps maintain the independence and effectiveness of the audit function. Businesses must stay informed about these requirements and any legislative updates to ensure proper audit practices, as non-compliance can lead to penalties and reputational damage. Ultimately, a properly appointed independent auditor serves as a safeguard for stakeholder interests and contributes significantly to the overall integrity of corporate financial reporting.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is LLP?

An LLP or Limited Liability Partnership is a business structure where business partners share limited liability, meaning their personal assets are protected in case the business incurs debts or liabilities.

LLPs are commonly used by professionals like lawyers, accountants, and consultants but are increasingly popular among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

An LLP is an ideal structure for businesses seeking operational flexibility, protection for partners' personal assets, and minimal compliance requirements. It is particularly attractive for professionals and small enterprises looking for a formal and efficient business framework.

This business structure also allows businesses to make use of the benefits of economies of scale, since LLPs can pool resources, expertise, and capital from multiple partners. By sharing operational responsibilities and costs, LLPs can reduce per-unit expenses, streamline processes, and negotiate better terms with suppliers.

This collaborative approach enables businesses to grow efficiently, expand their market presence, and achieve cost advantages typically associated with larger organizations.

How an LLP (Limited Liability Partnership) Works?

1. Hybrid Business Structure

A Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is a flexible business structure that operates with a mix of partnership and corporate elements.

2. Limited Liability Advantage

The main advantage of an LLP is that it provides limited liability to its partners. This means that, unlike a general partnership, your personal assets (such as your home or car) are typically protected in case of legal action.

3. Lawsuit and Liability Rules

In an LLP, if the business faces a lawsuit, the partnership itself becomes the primary target, not the personal property of the individual partners. However, if a partner personally engages in wrongdoing (e.g., fraud), they could still be held liable for their actions.

4. Example: Meena and Shalini’s Case

• Starting Out: Consider a scenario where two professionals, Meena and Shalini, decide to start a business offering consulting services in India. They have a shared interest in providing management consulting to small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Initially, they start with a mutual agreement and an informal arrangement.
• Formalizing the Structure: However, as the business grows, they realize the need to formalize the structure to protect themselves from legal and financial risks. Meena and Shalini choose to form an LLP (Limited Liability Partnership) to safeguard their personal assets from any potential legal liabilities that may arise in the course of business. They register the LLP with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) in India, creating an LLP agreement that outlines their responsibilities, profit-sharing ratios, and other operational details.
• Facing a Legal Dispute: A few months later, the consulting firm faces a legal dispute due to an issue with one of their clients. The client sues the LLP for professional negligence, claiming that the advice given led to a loss in business.
• Outcome of the Lawsuit: Since Meena and Shalini have formed an LLP, their personal assets—such as their homes, personal savings, or vehicles—are protected. The lawsuit can only target the assets of the LLP itself, not their personal belongings. However, if it is proven that either Meena or Shalini acted negligently or fraudulently in a personal capacity, that partner could still be held accountable for their individual actions.

LP (Limited Partnership) vs General Partnership

An LP (Limited Partnership) and a General Partnership are both business structures involving two or more partners, but they differ in terms of liability and management roles.

Limited Partnership (LP)

• In an LP, there are two types of partners: general partners and limited partners.
• General partners have full control over the management of the business and bear unlimited liability, meaning they are personally responsible for the business's debts and obligations.
• Limited partners, on the other hand, contribute capital but do not participate in day-to-day management. Their liability is limited to the amount they invest in the business, protecting their personal assets beyond that contribution.

General Partnership

• In a General Partnership, all partners share equal responsibility for managing the business and have unlimited liability.
• This means they are personally liable for the debts and obligations of the business.
• There is no distinction between the roles of partners—each partner participates in both the management and the liabilities of the business.

Key Difference

The key difference between the two is the level of liability protection and management involvement.

• An LP offers limited liability to some partners (limited partners).
• A General Partnership places full responsibility on all partners, making it a riskier option for individuals seeking protection from personal liability.

Related Read: What is the Difference Between LLP and Partnership?

LLP vs LLC

Ownership and structure

LLP refers to Limited Liability Partnership, where two or more partners collaborate to run the business. The partners can be individuals or corporate entities, and the number of partners can vary.

In an LLP, all partners share the management responsibilities and decision-making processes, unless the partnership agreement specifies otherwise. Partners have limited liability, meaning their personal assets are protected from business debts or legal claims.

LLC refers to a Limited Liability Company, which is a separate legal entity that can have one or more owners, known as members. The ownership can be divided among individual or corporate members, and the structure is more flexible than a corporation.

LLCs can be managed either by members (member-managed) or by designated managers (manager-managed). The members are not personally liable for the company’s debts or liabilities, providing them with protection similar to that of an LLP.

Liability protection

Partners in an LLP enjoy limited liability, meaning they are not personally liable for the debts or obligations of the business beyond their contribution to the partnership. However, if a partner engages in fraudulent or wrongful activities, they could still be personally liable for their actions.

LLC members also have limited liability, meaning they are generally not personally responsible for the company’s debts or liabilities. The LLC itself is a separate legal entity, so any financial obligations fall on the company, not the individual members. Similar to an LLP, members are protected unless they personally guarantee a debt or engage in illegal activities.

Decision making and management

In an LLP, all partners typically have a say in the management and operation of the business, unless otherwise specified in the LLP agreement. It is a more flexible structure in terms of decision-making since there is no requirement for a formal management team.

LLCs can be either member-managed or manager-managed. In a member-managed LLC, all members participate in managing the business, while in a manager-managed LLC, the members appoint managers to run the operations. This offers more structure compared to an LLP, especially for larger businesses.

Ownership transfer

Ownership in an LLP is typically not as easily transferable as in an LLC. Partners usually need to approve the admission of new partners or the transfer of ownership. This limits the liquidity and transferability of ownership interests.

Ownership in an LLC can be transferred more easily than in an LLP, depending on the terms of the operating agreement. LLCs can issue membership interests that can be bought or sold, making it easier to bring in new investors or transfer ownership.

LLP vs LP

An LP refers to a Limited Partnership, which is different from an LLP.

An LLP (Limited Liability Partnership) and an LP (Limited Partnership) are both business structures that involve multiple partners but differ in terms of liability and management.

In an LLP, all partners share equal responsibility for managing the business and enjoy limited liability, meaning their personal assets are protected from business debts. However, all partners are involved in decision-making unless specified otherwise in the agreement.

In contrast, an LPconsists of general partners and limited partners. General partners manage the business and have unlimited liability, while limited partners are only liable up to the amount of their investment and do not participate in the day-to-day operations.

The key difference lies in the roles and liabilities of the partners. In an LLP, all partners have equal liability protection and management control, whereas, in an LP, the general partners hold the management responsibility and are personally liable, while limited partners have liability protection but no management involvement.

The choice between the two structures depends on the desired level of involvement in business operations and the type of liability protection needed.

What are the advantages of LLP?

Wondering why you should choose LLP over other business registrations? Have a look:

• Easy & quick to build: Building an LLP is a simple process. It does not have complicated steps and requirements and neither does it take months of waiting time. The minimum amount of fees for incorporating an LLP is INR 500 and the maximum that can be spent is INR 5,600
• Continuity in succession: The life of the LLP is not affected by the death or retirement of any of the partners. If one of the partners withdraws because of any reasons, it does not mean that the LLP gets wound up. An LLP can only be shut down on the basis of the provisions of the Limited Liability Protection Act  of 2008
• Limited liability: All the partners of the LLP have limited liability, which means that the partners are not liable to pay the debts of the company from their personal assets. No partner is responsible for any other partner’s misbehaviour or misconduct
• Streamlines management: All the major decisions and management activities in an LLP are taken care of by the board of directors hence the shareholders receive very less power in making decisions
• Hassle-free transfers: There are no restrictions on joining and leaving an LLP. One can easily admit as a partner and transfer the ownership to others
• Taxation benefits: An LLP is exempt from various taxes such as dividend distribution tax and minimum alternative tax. Also, the rate of tax is less when compared to other business types
• No compulsory audit requirements: There is no mandatory audit requirement for an LLP until the company exceeds the annual turnover of INR 40 lakhs

What are the disadvantages of LLP?

• Not covered in all States: In India, there are certain variations in tax benefits from State to State. There are also cases when States restrict the formation of LLP. This is one of the major disadvantages of an LLP
• Less credibility: An LLP has many benefits but the fact is that people do not consider LLPs to be a credible business. People still trust companies or partnerships over LLPs
• Differences amongst partners: Since each partner is responsible for their own part, there are cases when partners do not consult each other before proceeding with a decision or agreement
• Transfer of interest: Though interest and ownership can be transferred, it usually is a long procedure. Various formalities are required to comply with the provisions of the Limited Liability Partnership Act

Related Read: LLP Advantages and Disadvantages

Documentation requirements for registering an LLP (2025)

Before you start with the procedure of registering an LLP or make changes in an existing LLP, have a look at the list of documents you might need:

• Form 7 is required to obtain a Designated Partner Identification Number (DIN) while registering your LLP. It may be sought from the MCA website. Along with the duly completed form, a registration fee of INR 100 must also be paid
• Form 1/ RUN-LLP is required to register a name for the LLP and reserve it. It may be used to christen an LLP or to alter the present name. The fee for submitting this form is Rs 10,000
• A request must also be filed by the partners for their DSC to be registered if it hasn’t already been done before
• Form 2/FiLLiP is required for incorporating a registered LLP. This form must be sent to and acknowledged by the concerned State’s Registrar
• An LLP agreement must be made, which outlines the duties of each partner involved. This requires the filling and submitting of Form 3
• In the case of changing, altering, adding or removing partners, the partners must submit Form 4
• Form 11 must be used to file the IT returns of the LLP
• If the office address of the LLP is to be changed, then Form 15 must be filed

How to form a Limited Liability Proprietorship

As mentioned earlier, forming an LLP is easy and quick. Before you get started, obtain a DSC or Digital Signature Certificate as the following steps will require it. File for one if you don’t already have one. Further, here are the steps involved in forming an LLP. You can visit mca.gov.in and follow the steps listed below:

1. Issue a Designated Partner Identification Number for yourself, which serves as an ID card
2. File Form 7 and pay the required fees
3. Register a name for your LLP using Form 1 and pay Rs 200
4. Incorporate the LLP via Form 2. The LLP agreement must also be made at this stage
5. File the LLP Agreement as per Section 2(o) of the LLP Act, 2008 using Form 3

With the above-mentioned steps, you are all set to start an LLP of your own.

Frequently Asked Questions

Form URC-1

Form URC-1, also known as the "URC 1 form", is an e-form prescribed under Rule 3(2) of the Companies (Authorised to Register) Rules, 2014. It enables various business entities, including partnerships, LLPs, societies, and others, to register as companies under Section 366 of the Companies Act, 2013. The form plays a crucial role in facilitating the formal registration process when an entity decides to transform its business structure into a company.

Filing Form URC-1 is mandatory for entities opting to convert into a company under the provisions of the Companies Act. It captures comprehensive details about the existing entity, the proposed company, and the compliance requirements for a smooth transition. By submitting this form, entities can initiate the company registration process and ensure adherence to the legal framework governing such conversions.

What is Section 366 of the Act?

Section 366 of the Companies Act, 2013 is a pivotal provision that allows various business entities, such as partnerships, LLPs, and societies, to register as companies under the Act. A significant amendment to this section, based on the recommendations of the Company Law Committee, reduced the minimum member requirement from seven to two, making it easier for smaller entities to convert into companies.

The scope of Section 366 has evolved since its introduction in the Companies Act, 1956. The 2017 amendments aimed to widen the eligibility criteria for registration, enabling more businesses to benefit from the advantages of operating as a company. This provision offers a streamlined pathway for entities formed under other laws to transition into the corporate structure governed by the Companies Act.

By registering under Section 366, entities can enjoy benefits such as limited liability protection, better access to capital, and enhanced credibility in the market. The provision creates a bridge between different legal frameworks, allowing businesses to adopt a more formal and regulated structure that aligns with their growth aspirations.

Companies that can be Registered under Section 366

Section 366 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows a wide range of entities to register as companies, including:

• Partnership firms
• Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs)
• Cooperative societies
• Societies registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860
• Any other business entity formed under other laws

These entities must have a minimum of two members to be eligible for registration under Section 366. They can convert into companies limited by shares, guarantee, or as unlimited companies.

It's important to note that Section 366 applies to entities originally formed under laws other than the Companies Act. It provides a pathway for these businesses to transition into the corporate structure and operate under the purview of the Companies Act, 2013.

This provision provides a legal pathway for such organisations to adopt a corporate structure, enabling them to operate under a more regulated framework while enjoying benefits like limited liability, perpetual succession, and enhanced legal status.

Purpose of Form URC-1

The primary purpose of Form URC-1 is to facilitate the registration of certain entities, such as partnerships, LLPs, and societies, as Part I Companies under the Companies Act, 2013. When an entity has seven or more members, Form URC-1 is filed along with Form INC-7 to initiate the company registration process.

Form URC-1 simplifies the online registration procedure by capturing all the necessary details and documents required for the conversion. It serves as a comprehensive application form that enables entities to provide information about their existing structure, proposed company details, and compliance with the legal requirements.

By filing Form URC-1, entities can ensure a smooth transition from their current legal status to a company registered under the Companies Act. The form helps in maintaining transparency and accuracy in the registration process, as it requires the submission of relevant documents and disclosures.

For entrepreneurs and startups, Form URC-1 acts as a practical tool, guiding them through the registration process and helping them understand the documents and disclosures needed for conversion.

Key Amendments and Implications

The Companies (Authorized To Register) Amendment Rules, 2023, introduced several significant changes to Form URC-1. The amended form now requires additional details, including:

The amendments aim to strengthen the due diligence process and ensure that all relevant information is disclosed during the registration process. By mandating the submission of these details, the MCA seeks to enhance the integrity and reliability of the information provided by the entities seeking to convert into companies.

The implications of these amendments are significant for entities considering registration under Section 366. They must ensure compliance with the new disclosure requirements and maintain proper documentation to support their application. The increased transparency and disclosures help in preventing any misrepresentation or concealment of material facts during the registration process.

Entities should carefully review the amended Form URC-1 and ensure that they have all the necessary information and documents ready before initiating the filing process.

Attachments to be submitted for Form URC-1

The amended Form URC-1 requires several mandatory attachments to be submitted along with the application. These documents provide supporting evidence and ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The key attachments include:

• Particulars of members/partners: A list of all members or partners of the existing entity, along with their details and shareholding pattern.
• Declaration by directors: A declaration by two or more proposed directors of the company, verifying the particulars of all members/partners.
• Affidavit for dissolution: An affidavit from all members/partners, confirming the dissolution of the existing entity.
• Instrument constituting the entity: A copy of the partnership deed, LLP agreement, or other instrument constituting or regulating the existing entity.
• Certificate of registration: A copy of the certificate of registration of the existing entity, issued by the relevant authority.
• No Objection Certificates (NOCs): NOC from any sectoral regulators or authorities, if applicable, depending on the nature of the business and the sector in which it operates
• Newspaper advertisement: A copy of the newspaper advertisement published in a English and a vernacular language newspaper, giving notice of the proposed registration.
• Compliance certificate: A certificate from a practicing professional (CA/CS/CWA), confirming compliance with the provisions of the Stamp Act, to the extent applicable.
• Consent of majority members: A resolution passed by a majority of members, agreeing to the registration of the entity as a company.
• Statement of Accounts: Optionally, a statement of accounts and a valuation report determining the value of assets and liabilities of the existing entity

These attachments provide critical information about the existing entity, its members, and the proposed company. The affidavit from members ensures their consent and commitment to the conversion process. NOCs from regulatory authorities help in identifying any sector-specific compliance requirements or approvals needed for the conversion. The consent and declarations from the first directors establish their eligibility and willingness to take on the responsibilities of directors in the newly registered company. The copies of incorporation documents and constitutional papers provide proof of the existing entity's legal status and governance framework.

Entities should ensure that all the required attachments are duly prepared, signed, and submitted along with Form URC-1. Incomplete or missing attachments may lead to delays or rejection of the registration application. It is advisable to maintain proper records and documentation to support the information provided in the form and the attachments.

Frequently Asked Questions