Company Status Strike-Off Meaning Explained

Eligibility

• Must be registered under the Government of India's MSME Development Act of 2006.
• Must be a company registered under the Companies Act of the Government of India and must meet the investment restrictions in plant and machinery or equipment set forth in the Government of India's MSME Development Act 2006.
• Must be a technology incubation enterprise or a startup registered as a company and located in an incubation center or park (in this case, a certification from the incubation center or park is required).
• Must be an STP Unit that has been approved.
• The invention must be in the field of electronics or information and communication technologies.

List Of Important Documents Required

1. Scanned copy of MSME Registration Certificate (For MSME Units)
2. Scanned copy of Company Registration Certificate (For Companies)
3. Scanned copy of STP Registration (For STP Units)
4. Scanned copy of the Registration Certificate issued by a competent authority and a certification from the incubation Centre/Park (For Technology Incubation Enterprise/Startup)
5. Scanned copy of the last audited Balance Sheet
6. Copy of product brochure, if any
7. Copy of latest Annual Report, if any
8. Copy of official filing receipt (OFR) with the Indian Patent Office
9. Copy of waiver under section 39 of the Indian Patent Act (Outside India)
10. Copy of proof of the application under PCT/ Paris Convention or Direct International Filing
11. Copy of technical writeup of invention as per the format of technical writeup
12. Patent search report
13. Scanned copy of Details for transfer of e-payments as per the format
14. Scanned copy of the Declaration form duly signed and sealed as per the format
15. A statement by the auditor of the enterprise that they fulfill the criteria of investment in plant and machinery or investment in capital equipment (as the case may be) as stipulated in the MSMED Act 2006.

Application procedure for Startups

• Visit the official website http://www.ict-ipr.in/sipeit/login.
• Create a User account by logging in after filling out all the details.
• Once “Login” is created, one can apply online for the scheme by submitting the required documents.

Selection OR Acceptance of Startups

The acceptance of startups under this scheme depends on the following criteria:

• For a particular invention, there can be one application for foreign filling.
• An Indian patent attorney firm with at least five years of experience in handling international patent applications handles and processes patent applications.
• Only five applications per financial year will be considered for reimbursement from a single applicant.
• The applicant should have already filed a patent application with the complete specification for the said invention with the Indian Patent Office.
• International patent filing options include the PCT route, the Paris Convention route, or filing directly in a foreign country of the innovator's choice.

Benefits

• This scheme provides financial support for the International filing of patents at different stages, including expenses in filing and processing.
• The maximum amount reimbursed per innovation shall be Rs 15 lakhs or 50% of the total expenditures paid in filing and processing a patent application up to grant, whichever is less.
• Under the scheme, financial support is also provided to Education Institutes, Meity societies, etc., for organizing seminars & workshops on IPR awareness.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Winding Up of a Company?

Winding up a company refers to the legal process of closing its operations permanently. It involves selling the company's assets, settling its debts and liabilities, and distributing any remaining surplus among shareholders according to their rights. Once the process is complete, the company is dissolved and ceases to exist as a legal entity. Winding up may be voluntary, initiated by members or creditors, or compulsory, ordered by a court.

The main reasons for winding up a company include:

• Ceasing the company's operations
• Collecting the company's assets
• Paying off the company's debts and liabilities
• Distributing any remaining assets to the members

The main reasons for winding up a company include:

• Inability to pay debts (insolvency)
• Completion of the purpose for which the company was formed
• Expiry of the period fixed for the duration of the company
• The passing of a special resolution by the members to wind up the company

Key Aspects of Winding Up of a Company

The winding up of a company involves several key aspects that need to be considered:

1.  Appointment of Liquidator

A liquidator is a person or entity responsible for managing the winding-up process of a company, including selling assets, settling liabilities, and distributing remaining funds to stakeholders. A liquidator is appointed to manage the winding up process. He is appointed by members or creditors in voluntary winding up or by the court in compulsory winding up. 

2.  Realisation of Assets

The liquidator takes possession of all the company's assets and realises them into cash. This may involve selling the company's property, plant and equipment, collecting debts from debtors, and recovering any unpaid capital from the contributors.

3.  Payment of Liabilities

The liquidator settles all the company's liabilities, including debts owed to creditors, outstanding taxes and employee dues. The order of priority for payment is fixed by law, with secured creditors being paid first, followed by unsecured creditors and members.

4. Distribution of Surplus

After settling all the liabilities, surplus assets are distributed among the members in proportion to their shareholding. Preference shareholders are paid first, including any arrears, as per their rights. Once their claims are fully settled, the remaining surplus is allocated to equity shareholders in proportion to their shareholding. This process adheres to the company’s articles and legal requirements, ensuring an equitable distribution.

5. Dissolution of Company

Once the winding up process is complete, the liquidator submits a final report to the Tribunal or the ROC. The Tribunal then orders the dissolution of the company, and its name is struck off from the register of companies.

Types of Winding Up

There are three main modes of winding up of a company under the Companies Act 2013:

1. Compulsory Winding Up of a Company (By the Tribunal)
2. Voluntary Winding Up of a Company

a) Members' Voluntary Winding Up

b) Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up

3. Winding Up Subject to the Supervision of the Tribunal

Let us discuss each of these types in detail.

1. Compulsory Winding Up (By the Court)

Compulsory winding up of a company is when a company is wound up by an order of a court or tribunal. This is also known as "winding up by the court". The court may order a company to be wound up on various grounds specified in Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956 (now governed by Chapter XX of the Companies Act, 2013).

Compulsory winding up of a company is initiated by a petition filed before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) by:

• The company itself
• The company's creditors
• The company's contributors
• The Registrar of Companies
• Any person authorised by the Central Government

The grounds for compulsory winding up include:

• Inability to pay debts
• Acting against the sovereignty and integrity of India
• Conducting affairs in a fraudulent manner
• Failure to file financial statements or annual returns for five consecutive years
• The Tribunal is of the opinion that it is just and equitable to wind up the company

If the NCLT is satisfied that a prima facie case for winding up is made out, it admits the petition, appoints an official liquidator and makes an order for winding up.

2. Voluntary winding up of a company

Voluntary winding up is when a company is wound up by its members or creditors without the intervention of a court or tribunal. Voluntary winding up is initiated by the company itself by passing a special resolution in a general meeting. There are two types of voluntary winding up:

1. Members' Voluntary Winding Up

This occurs when the company is solvent and can pay its debts in full. A declaration of solvency is made by a majority of the directors, stating that they have made an inquiry into the company's affairs and believe that the company has no debts or will be able to pay its debts in full within three years from the commencement of the winding up.

2.  Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: 

This occurs when the company is insolvent and unable to pay its debts in full. No declaration of solvency is made in this case. The creditors play a greater role in this type of winding up compared to a members' voluntary winding up.

In a voluntary winding up, the company appoints a liquidator in a general meeting to conduct the winding up proceedings.

3. Winding Up Subject to the Supervision of the Court

A voluntary winding up (whether members' or creditors') may be converted into a winding up by the Tribunal if the Tribunal is of the opinion that the company's affairs are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the public or the company.

In such cases, the Tribunal may order that the voluntary winding up shall continue but subject to the supervision of the Tribunal. The Tribunal may appoint an additional liquidator to conduct the winding up along with the liquidator appointed by the company.

Winding Up a Company Process

The procedure for winding up of a company in India depends on the mode of winding up. Here is a step-by-step procedure for compulsory winding up of a company in India and voluntary winding up:

The process of winding up of a company in India is complex and involves several legal formalities. It is advisable to seek the assistance of a professional (such as a company secretary or a lawyer) to ensure compliance with all the requirements.

Example of Winding up of a Company

One notable example of the winding up of a company in India is the case of Kingfisher Airlines Limited. Kingfisher Airlines was a prominent Indian airline that ceased operations in 2012 due to financial difficulties and mounting debts.

In 2016, the Karnataka High Court ordered the winding up of the company on a petition filed by the Airports Authority of India, which was one of the company's creditors. The court appointed an Official Liquidator to take charge of the company's assets and manage the winding up process.

The liquidator faced several challenges in the winding up process, including the recovery of dues from the company's debtors and the sale of its assets. The company had a fleet of aircraft and other assets, which had to be valued and sold to pay off the creditors.

One of the major issues in the winding up of Kingfisher Airlines was the recovery of dues from its promoter, Vijay Mallya. Mallya had given personal guarantees for some of the loans taken by the company, and the creditors sought to recover these dues from him. However, Mallya fled to the UK, and the Indian authorities have been trying to extradite him to face charges of fraud and money laundering.

The winding up process of Kingfisher Airlines is still ongoing, and the liquidator is working to realise the company's assets and settle its liabilities. The case highlights the challenges involved in the winding up of a large and complex company with multiple stakeholders and legal issues.

The Kingfisher Airlines case also underscores the importance of timely action by creditors in the event of default by a company. Many of the company's creditors, including banks and airports, had allowed the debts to accumulate for several years before initiating legal action. This delay made it more difficult to recover the dues and increased the losses for the creditors.

In conclusion, the winding up of Kingfisher Airlines is a cautionary tale for companies and creditors alike. It highlights the need for effective risk management, timely action in case of default, and the importance of following due process in the winding-up of a company.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the winding up is a legal process of  liquidating a company's assets, settling of liabilities and distributing surplus to its members. It is a complex process that requires careful planning and execution, and the guidance of professional advisors. 

There are three modes in winding up under companies act 2013: compulsory winding up by the Tribunal, voluntary winding up by the members or creditors and winding up under the Tribunal's supervision. 

These modes of winding up have specific requirements and procedures. Proper planning and professional guidance can help minimise the impact on stakeholders like creditors, employees and members, ensuring a smoother and compliant winding-up process.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Disqualification of a Director as per Section 164(2)?

Section 164(2) addresses disqualification arising from company defaults in statutory compliance. According to this provision, a person is disqualified from being appointed or continuing as a director if the company fails to file its annual returns or financial statements for three consecutive financial years.

Key consequences include:

• Deactivation of Director Identification Number (DIN): Once flagged by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), the director’s DIN is deactivated, preventing them from being appointed in any other company.
  
  
• Five-Year Ineligibility: The director cannot be appointed in any company for five years from the date of disqualification.
  
  
• Reappointment Conditions: Reappointment is possible only after the disqualification is removed or after five years' lapse. Directors can appeal to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for temporary relief while the matter is under consideration.

Related Read: KYC of Directors: Form DIR-3 Requirements, Fees, Penalty

Disqualification of Directors

Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013, outlines various scenarios where a director may be disqualified. The disqualification framework is broadly classified into the following categories:

1. Personal Grounds:

• Declared of unsound mind by a competent court.
• Declared insolvent and not discharged.
• Convicted by a court and sentenced to imprisonment for two years or more.
• Fails to repay calls on shares or debentures.

2. Company-Related Defaults:

• Failure to file annual returns or financial statements for three consecutive years.
• Failure to repay deposits accepted by the company.
• Failure to redeem debentures on maturity.
• Failure to pay interest or dividend within the prescribed time.

3. Additional Provisions:

• Articles of Association (AoA) may impose extra restrictions based on the nature of the business or governance structure.

Reasons for Disqualification of Directors

Directors are disqualified for various reasons, primarily to protect the integrity of business practices and stakeholders’ interests. Some common grounds include:

• Failure to repay deposits or dividends within the stipulated time.
• Insolvency: Inability to meet financial obligations.
• Criminal conviction: Imprisonment for offence like fraud, financial misconduct, or corruption.
• Mental incapacity: Declared unsound mind by a court.
• Non-disclosure of interests: Concealing personal interests or conflicts of interest.
• Court-ordered restrictions: Being barred by court orders from holding managerial positions.

What is the effect of the disqualification of directors?

The disqualification of a director has significant implications for both the individual and the company:

• The director cannot be appointed or continue on any company’s board for more than five years, or as prescribed by applicable regulations.
• The director’s DIN is deactivated, blocking them from participation in corporate filings or board-related matters.
• Board decisions may be affected if the director’s absence impacts quorum or governance.
• Legal repercussions may arise if the disqualification is not addressed within the stipulated time.

What remedies are available for the disqualification of directors?

The Companies Act provides avenues for directors to challenge disqualification:

1. Appeal to NCLT: A director can file an appeal within 30 days of disqualification to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) seeking relief.
   
   
2. Temporary Stay Order: During the appeal process, NCLT may grant a temporary stay, allowing the director to continue in office until the matter is adjudicated.
   
   
3. Corrective Action: If the default arises from non-compliance, the company can file pending returns or documents to seek relief.
   
   
4. Higher Courts: Directors may approach the High Courts if they believe the disqualification was unfair or based on incorrect facts.

Important solutions for Disqualification of Directors u/s 164(2)

Directors disqualified under Section 164(2) due to failure in filing statutory returns can explore the following remedies:

1. Appeal to NCLAT or High Courts: Directors can file an appeal seeking relief and challenge the disqualification.
2. Compliance Rectification: The company can update missing filings to address the issue.
3. Wait for Reappointment: If relief is not granted, the director becomes eligible for appointment after completing the five-year period.
4. Case Variability: Different High Courts may adopt distinct approaches; some grant stay orders, while others strictly adhere to statutory provisions.

Although there is no direct process for immediate reappointment, compliance and judicial recourse offer pathways to overcome disqualification.

Reappointment of Disqualified Directors

A disqualified director may seek reappointment after the prescribed period or upon removal of the disqualification. To ensure compliance, certain documents must be filed with the Registrar of Companies (ROC):

Essential Documents:

• Financial Statements 
• Board’s Report 
• Annual Return 
• Auditor’s Report 
• Shareholder Resolutions 
• Director Disclosures 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)