{"id":27012,"date":"2026-06-09T22:48:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-09T17:18:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/?p=27012"},"modified":"2026-06-15T10:38:14","modified_gmt":"2026-06-15T05:08:14","slug":"renegotiate-payment-gateway-pricing-1-crore-gmv-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/renegotiate-payment-gateway-pricing-1-crore-gmv-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Scaling to \u20b91 Crore GMV? How to Choose and Renegotiate Payment Gateway Pricing in India"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At \u20b91 crore in monthly gross merchandise value, payment gateway pricing stops being a line item and becomes a margin decision. A 0.2 percentage point cut in transaction rate saves \u20b920,000 a month. A five-point lift in payment success rate unlocks roughly \u20b95 lakh in collected revenue over the same period. Yet most merchants still compare payment gateways by headline MDR alone, ignoring AMCs, refund leakage, instant settlement surcharges, and chargeback fees that compound at scale. This guide reframes the question around Total Cost of Ownership and walks through the math, benchmarks, and data you need to renegotiate once you cross \u20b91 crore.<\/p>\n<div style=\"border-left: 4px solid #007BFF; background: #f0f8ff; padding: 25px; margin: 30px 0; border-radius: 8px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; text-align: left;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin-top: 0; color: #007bff; font-size: 22px;\">Key Takeaways<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"margin: 15px 0; padding-left: 20px; color: #333; line-height: 1.6;\">\n<li>A 0.2% MDR cut on \u20b91 crore monthly GMV saves \u20b920,000 per month or \u20b92.4 lakh per year. The often-quoted \u20b924 lakh figure assumes \u20b910 crore monthly GMV.<\/li>\n<li>A 5 percentage point lift in payment success rate at \u20b91 crore GMV unlocks roughly \u20b95 lakh in additional collected revenue per month, before fees.<\/li>\n<li>Annual maintenance charges of \u20b94,999 add \u20b9416 to monthly operating costs and can erase the advantage of a lower headline TDR.<\/li>\n<li>MDR is generally not refunded when you refund a customer. On \u20b91 crore GMV with a 10% refund rate at 2% fees, that is \u20b920,000 per month in unrecoverable cost.<\/li>\n<li>Instant settlement surcharges of 0.25% to 0.50% function as short-term financing. On \u20b91 crore settled instantly at 0.50%, that is \u20b950,000 per month.<\/li>\n<li>Custom pricing conversations typically begin above \u20b95 lakh monthly GMV. By \u20b91 crore, method-wise pricing should be on the table.<\/li>\n<li>Bank-linked UPI has zero network MDR, but payment gateways can still charge a platform fee. Wallet UPI above \u20b92,000 carries 0.5% to 1.1% interchange.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Why \u20b91 Crore GMV Changes Payment Gateway Pricing<\/h2>\n<p>At a few lakhs of monthly GMV, the gap between 1.95% and 2.00% transaction fees is a rounding error against rent, payroll, and ad spend. At \u20b91 crore, the arithmetic flips. Every 0.05 percentage point shift on the headline rate equals \u20b95,000 a month, and the cumulative effect of fixed fees, refund leakage, and failed transactions is now visible in monthly P&amp;L reports.<\/p>\n<p>Two things change at this threshold. First, payment gateways start treating you as a custom-pricing account rather than a self-serve SKU. Public rate cards are designed for merchants under \u20b95 lakh monthly GMV. Above that, providers expect to negotiate, model risk based on your method mix and chargeback ratio, and structure tiered rates that decline with volume.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the cost levers multiply. At \u20b91 crore, AMCs, instant settlement surcharges, NACH rejection fees, refund-driven MDR, and dispute fees each begin to register as meaningful rupee values. The merchant who optimises only the headline number leaves money on the table in four other categories.<\/p>\n<p>The right frame is Total Cost of Ownership: transaction fees plus fixed fees plus revenue lost to failure plus refund MDR plus settlement surcharges plus dispute costs. The <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/payment-gateway-pricing-impact-on-margins\/\">payment gateway pricing impact on margins<\/a> is best understood through that lens.<\/p>\n<h2>First, Correct the Math: MDR Savings vs Success Rate Gains<\/h2>\n<p>Before negotiating anything, it is worth correcting a figure that appears in several published guides on enterprise pricing.<\/p>\n<h3>What a 0.2 percentage point MDR reduction is actually worth<\/h3>\n<p>At \u20b91 crore monthly GMV, the calculation is straightforward:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u20b91,00,00,000 \u00d7 0.2% = \u20b920,000 per month<\/li>\n<li>\u20b920,000 \u00d7 12 = \u20b92.4 lakh per year<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Some guides quote \u20b924 lakh in annual savings from a 0.2% cut. That figure is correct only at \u20b910 crore monthly GMV. Walking into a negotiation expecting \u20b924 lakh of annual savings from a small basis-point cut will lead to disappointment; expecting \u20b92.4 lakh per year, combined with other levers, is realistic.<\/p>\n<h3>What a 5 percentage point success rate improvement is worth<\/h3>\n<p>The same \u20b91 crore base, run through payment success rate, produces a much larger number:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u20b91,00,00,000 \u00d7 5% = \u20b95 lakh per month in additional collected revenue<\/li>\n<li>\u20b95 lakh \u00d7 12 = \u20b960 lakh per year<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Indian e-commerce payment success rates typically sit between 85% and 90%, with top performers above 95%. A merchant moving from 85% to 90% collects an extra \u20b95 lakh per month, assuming failures were technical rather than intent-driven.<\/p>\n<p>The implication is direct. A 0.2% MDR cut delivers \u20b920,000 per month. A 5-point success rate improvement delivers \u20b95 lakh per month. The success rate lever is roughly 25 times larger. Negotiate MDR, but do not switch to a lower-MDR provider if it materially reduces your success rate.<\/p>\n<div style=\"background: #f9fbff; border-left: 4px solid #007BFF; padding: 22px 25px; margin: 30px 0; border-radius: 8px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #333; line-height: 1.6;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin: 0 0 12px 0; color: #007bff; font-size: 20px; display: flex; align-items: center;\">Did You Know?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin: 0; font-size: 16px;\">At \u20b91 crore monthly GMV, a 0.2 percentage point reduction in MDR saves \u20b920,000 per month. The same merchant gains \u20b95 lakh per month from a 5 percentage point improvement in payment success rate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Understand the Fee Stack: MDR, TDR, Platform Fee, Interchange, GST, AMC, and Setup Fee<\/h2>\n<p>Negotiation requires precise vocabulary. Most published rate cards collapse several distinct costs into one number.<\/p>\n<h3>MDR vs TDR vs platform fee<\/h3>\n<p>Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) is the percentage retained by the acquiring bank and network on a card transaction. MDR splits into three pieces: interchange paid to the issuing bank, network assessment paid to the card network, and acquirer or processor markup. Interchange and network fees are regulated and largely non-negotiable. The processor markup is where negotiation happens.<\/p>\n<p>Transaction Discount Rate (TDR) is often used interchangeably with MDR in India but is more accurately the payment gateway&#8217;s own share. Platform fee is the broadest term and covers processing, fraud screening, reconciliation, dashboard access, and support. For a fuller breakdown of <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/convenience-fee-tdr-mdr-platform-fee-amc-setup-fee-technology-fee-of-payment-gateway\/\">payment gateway pricing terminology<\/a>, the underlying components are worth understanding individually.<\/p>\n<h3>Why UPI can be zero MDR but not zero payment gateway cost<\/h3>\n<p>Bank-linked UPI has zero network MDR under RBI policy. But the payment gateway can still charge a platform fee for processing, security, settlement, and reconciliation work.<\/p>\n<p>Wallet-based UPI is a different instrument. For transactions above \u20b92,000 through a prepaid payment instrument wallet, NPCI rules apply interchange of 0.5% to 1.1% depending on merchant category. RuPay credit card on UPI is another distinct rail and typically carries 1.1% to 2.0% MDR plus a platform fee. The full breakdown is documented in the <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/learn\/upi-transaction-charges\/\">UPI transaction charges guide<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>How GST is applied<\/h3>\n<p>GST at 18% is charged on the payment gateway fee, not on the gross transaction value. On a \u20b91,000 sale at a 2% fee, the fee is \u20b920, and GST is 18% of \u20b920, or \u20b93.60. Total deduction is \u20b923.60, not \u20b9180.<\/p>\n<h3>AMC and setup fees<\/h3>\n<p>Annual maintenance charges are recurring fixed fees &#8211; often \u20b93,600 to \u20b94,999 per year &#8211; that some payment gateways levy independent of volume. Setup fees are one-time charges, sometimes waived during onboarding promotions. Both are fully negotiable above \u20b95 lakh monthly GMV and should be zero by the time you cross \u20b91 crore.<\/p>\n<h2>Public Payment Gateway Pricing Benchmarks in India<\/h2>\n<p>Published SME rates from major Indian payment gateways are the floor of the negotiation, not the ceiling. At \u20b91 crore GMV, you should be pricing well below these public numbers.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Headline metric<\/th>\n<th>Public benchmark observed in the Indian market<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Domestic platform fee (cards, UPI, net banking)<\/td>\n<td>1.90% to 2.00% on SME rate cards, with one promotional rate of 1.60% offered between 18 September 2025 and 31 December 2025<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Higher-cost instruments (Amex, Diners, EMI, international cards)<\/td>\n<td>3.00% to 3.50%, with multi-currency processing at the top<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Credit-card-on-UPI rate<\/td>\n<td>Around 2.15% platform fee on some published rate cards<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Fixed-fee model<\/td>\n<td>2.00% + \u20b93 per transaction across most domestic methods; 5.00% + \u20b93 for digital products<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Category-specific MDR<\/td>\n<td>UPI under \u20b92,000 at 0.40%, UPI above \u20b92,000 at 0.90%, hotel and lodging up to 3.99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Annual maintenance charges<\/td>\n<td>\u20b90 to \u20b94,999 per year depending on provider<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Setup fees<\/td>\n<td>\u20b90 to \u20b910,000, with instant settlement add-ons commonly \u20b95,000 to \u20b910,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NACH mandate rejection<\/td>\n<td>\u20b915 per rejected mandate plus 18% GST<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tokenization fees<\/td>\n<td>\u20b91.25 per token plus 18% GST, with cryptogram requests at \u20b90.20 each<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Messaging fees<\/td>\n<td>\u20b90.30 per WhatsApp message and \u20b90.25 per SMS<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Single transaction limit on bill-payment models<\/td>\n<td>\u20b910,000 per transaction in one bill payment structure<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>A zero-AMC, zero-setup baseline becomes important in the Total Cost of Ownership math, particularly when compared against payment gateways with lower headline TDR but recurring fixed fees.<\/p>\n<div style=\"background: #f9fbff; border-left: 4px solid #007BFF; padding: 22px 25px; margin: 30px 0; border-radius: 8px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #333; line-height: 1.6;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin: 0 0 12px 0; color: #007bff; font-size: 20px; display: flex; align-items: center;\">Did You Know?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin: 0; font-size: 16px;\">A payment gateway charging \u20b94,999 annually in AMC adds \u20b9416 to monthly operating costs. At \u20b92.08 lakh monthly GMV, that fixed fee erases the rupee advantage of a 0.25 percentage point lower transaction rate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Calculate Total Cost of Ownership, Not Just MDR<\/h2>\n<p>The headline rate is a marketing number. The number that matters is what lands in your bank account after every fee, failure, and refund.<\/p>\n<h3>The TCO formula<\/h3>\n<p><code>Total Cost = Transaction Fees + Fixed Fees + Revenue Lost to Payment Failure + Refund MDR + Settlement Surcharges + Dispute Costs<\/code><\/p>\n<h3>The Net Realized Revenue formula<\/h3>\n<p><code>Net Realized Revenue = (GMV \u00d7 Payment Success Rate) - Payment Gateway Fees - Monthly Fixed Fees<\/code><\/p>\n<h3>The \u20b91 crore comparison<\/h3>\n<p>Consider two offers a merchant at \u20b91 crore monthly GMV might receive.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Variable<\/th>\n<th>Payment Gateway A<\/th>\n<th>Payment Gateway B<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Monthly GMV (\u20b9)<\/td>\n<td>1,00,00,000<\/td>\n<td>1,00,00,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Headline transaction rate (%)<\/td>\n<td>2.00<\/td>\n<td>1.80<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Payment success rate (%)<\/td>\n<td>93<\/td>\n<td>85<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Annual maintenance charge (\u20b9\/year)<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>4,999<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Monthly AMC equivalent (\u20b9)<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<td>416<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Collected GMV (\u20b9)<\/td>\n<td>93,00,000<\/td>\n<td>85,00,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Transaction fees (\u20b9)<\/td>\n<td>2,00,000<\/td>\n<td>1,80,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Net Realized Revenue (\u20b9)<\/td>\n<td>91,00,000<\/td>\n<td>83,19,584<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The gap is roughly \u20b97.8 lakh per month, or \u20b993.6 lakh annually, in favour of the higher-headline-rate provider. The 0.2 percentage point MDR advantage held by Payment Gateway B is worth \u20b920,000 per month. The eight-percentage-point success rate gap held by Payment Gateway A is worth \u20b98 lakh per month. Headline rate loses the comparison decisively.<\/p>\n<h3>The break-even point on AMC<\/h3>\n<p>A payment gateway charging \u20b94,999 in annual AMC needs to offer a sufficiently lower TDR to compensate. At \u20b92.08 lakh monthly GMV, a 0.20 percentage point lower TDR exactly offsets the \u20b9416 monthly AMC equivalent. Above that GMV, the TDR advantage compounds &#8211; but only if success rate, refund policy, and settlement terms hold equal. At \u20b91 crore, the AMC never adds value.<\/p>\n<p>For the deeper logic behind <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/payment-success-rate-optimization-india\/\">payment success rate optimization<\/a>, the inputs to that 93% figure are worth examining before any switch.<\/p>\n<h2>Hidden Costs to Model Before You Renegotiate<\/h2>\n<p>These five categories rarely appear on published rate cards but show up on monthly invoices.<\/p>\n<h3>Refunds and non-refundable MDR<\/h3>\n<p>When you refund a customer, the payment gateway generally does not refund the MDR it took on the original transaction. The fee covered the cost of processing and is treated as earned. Pre-capture cancellations are the exception, since no MDR is levied until capture.<\/p>\n<p>At \u20b91 crore GMV with a 10% refund rate and a 2% fee:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Refunded GMV: \u20b910 lakh per month<\/li>\n<li>MDR paid on that refunded volume: \u20b920,000 per month<\/li>\n<li>Annual refund MDR leakage: \u20b92.4 lakh<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Better inventory accuracy, clearer product descriptions, and pre-authorisation flows that delay capture until fulfilment is confirmed all reduce this leakage. The mechanics are documented in the <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/refunds-and-mdr-in-payment-gateways\/\">refunds and MDR explainer<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3>Recurring billing: eNACH, NACH rejection, and UPI AutoPay<\/h3>\n<p>Subscription businesses face fees that flat-rate models obscure. NACH mandate rejection charges of \u20b915 plus 18% GST accumulate quickly. A merchant with 10,000 active mandates and a 5% rejection rate pays \u20b97,500 per cycle in rejection charges alone.<\/p>\n<p>UPI AutoPay generally has faster setup, lower per-debit cost, and higher acceptance for small-ticket recurring charges than eNACH. The <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/upi-autopay-vs-enach-comparison\/\">UPI AutoPay vs eNACH comparison<\/a> and analysis of the <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/cheapest-payment-gateway-for-recurring-billing-e-nach-upi-autopay-and-subscription\/\">cheapest payment gateway for recurring billing<\/a> cover the trade-offs. At \u20b91 crore GMV in a subscription model, demand explicit disclosure of mandate creation, rejection, retry, and per-debit fees.<\/p>\n<h3>Instant settlement as a working capital cost<\/h3>\n<p>Standard settlement runs at T+2 or T+3. Instant settlement compresses to T+0 for an additional 0.25% to 0.50%, sometimes with a \u20b95,000 to \u20b910,000 setup fee and a daily cap around \u20b95 crore.<\/p>\n<p>At \u20b91 crore settled instantly at 0.50%, the cost is \u20b950,000 per month. Treat that as a financing decision. The annualised cost of accelerating two days of cash flow at 0.50% per cycle is meaningfully higher than most working capital lines. The mechanics of <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/settlement-cycle-in-india-t1-t0-impact\/\">settlement cycles in India<\/a> are worth modelling against your actual working capital cost. The full pricing structure of an <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/instant-settlement-payment-gateway\/\">instant settlement payment gateway<\/a> helps frame the comparison.<\/p>\n<h3>Chargebacks and dispute handling<\/h3>\n<p>Chargeback fees are charged per dispute regardless of outcome. Even when you win, the fee is not refunded. Global benchmarks cite \u20b91,500 to \u20b98,000 per case, and indirect costs amplify that. A chargeback ratio below 0.5% is a direct negotiation lever, signalling lower risk to the acquirer.<\/p>\n<h3>Messaging, tokenization, and per-feature fees<\/h3>\n<p>One published rate card charges \u20b91.25 per token, \u20b90.20 per cryptogram, \u20b90.30 per WhatsApp message, and \u20b90.25 per SMS, all plus 18% GST. At one million monthly notifications, that is \u20b92.5 lakh to \u20b93 lakh in messaging fees alone. Ask whether you can route notifications through your own stack.<\/p>\n<div style=\"background: #f9fbff; border-left: 4px solid #007BFF; padding: 22px 25px; margin: 30px 0; border-radius: 8px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #333; line-height: 1.6;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin: 0 0 12px 0; color: #007bff; font-size: 20px; display: flex; align-items: center;\">Did You Know?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin: 0; font-size: 16px;\">Chargeback fees are not refunded even when the merchant wins the dispute. They are treated as compensation for the bank&#8217;s processing cost.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>How Indian Payment Policy Changes Your Payment Gateway Cost<\/h2>\n<p>Regulatory structure determines what is negotiable and what is not.<\/p>\n<h3>Zero MDR on UPI and RuPay debit<\/h3>\n<p>RBI policy mandates zero MDR at the network level for bank-linked UPI and RuPay debit transactions. The platform fee charged by the payment gateway on top of that zero MDR is what you negotiate. A merchant with a high share of bank-linked UPI has structurally lower cost to serve and a stronger argument for low UPI platform fees.<\/p>\n<h3>PPI wallet UPI above \u20b92,000<\/h3>\n<p>NPCI introduced interchange on wallet-based UPI above \u20b92,000, paid by the merchant to the PPI issuer. Rates by merchant category include 0.5% for fuel, 0.7% for utilities and education, 0.9% for supermarkets, and <span data-sheets-root=\"1\">1.0% for insurance, mutual funds, railways, and government merchant categories<\/span>. A merchant with 20% of \u20b91 crore GMV in a 0.9% category pays \u20b918,000 per month in PPI interchange alone.<\/p>\n<h3>RuPay credit card on UPI is not zero-MDR UPI<\/h3>\n<p>RuPay credit-on-UPI typically carries 1.1% to 2.0% MDR plus a platform fee. When a customer pays through this rail, the cost profile resembles a card transaction. Method-wise reporting is the only way to see this clearly.<\/p>\n<h3>Authentication mandate and operational constraints in 2026<\/h3>\n<p>RBI&#8217;s Authentication Mechanisms for Digital Payment Transactions Directions require two-factor authentication on all domestic digital payments from 1 April 2026, with at least one dynamic factor. NPCI&#8217;s TPAP volume cap at 30% of UPI volume has a compliance deadline of 31 December 2026. UPI also has operational limits: \u20b91 lakh daily base, 20 transactions per day per user, and scheduled recurring payments only in non-peak windows. These affect success rates, fraud risk, and routing strategy.<\/p>\n<h2>What to Prepare Before Renegotiating Payment Gateway Pricing<\/h2>\n<p>Negotiation without data is a wishlist. Walking into a conversation at \u20b91 crore monthly GMV requires a structured data pack and a structured ask.<\/p>\n<h3>Build your 6-month payment data pack<\/h3>\n<p>The data pack establishes your risk profile and processing economics. Assemble:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Monthly GMV and transaction count for the last six months<\/li>\n<li>Average order value, broken down by payment method<\/li>\n<li>Payment method mix: bank-linked UPI, wallet UPI, debit cards, domestic credit cards, net banking, EMI, BNPL, international cards<\/li>\n<li>Success rate by method and by issuing bank<\/li>\n<li>Refund rate and average refund timing<\/li>\n<li>Chargeback ratio and dispute outcomes<\/li>\n<li>International card share<\/li>\n<li>Recurring billing volume, mandate rejection rate, AutoPay performance<\/li>\n<li>Current settlement cycle and any instant settlement usage<\/li>\n<li>Two competing written quotes from other payment gateways<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A merchant who walks in with this pack converts the conversation from &#8220;what is your rate&#8221; to &#8220;what is your offer against my risk profile.&#8221; The framework draws on the same logic as <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/enterprise-payment-gateway-pricing-in-india-volume-based-pricing-strategies\/\">enterprise payment gateway pricing<\/a>, where custom pricing typically begins above \u20b95 lakh monthly GMV.<\/p>\n<h3>What to ask for at \u20b91 crore GMV<\/h3>\n<p>The ask should be specific and itemised:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Method-wise pricing for each payment instrument<\/li>\n<li>Domestic card TDR in the 1.4% to 1.6% range<\/li>\n<li>UPI platform fee at the lower end given high bank-linked UPI share<\/li>\n<li>Zero annual maintenance charge<\/li>\n<li>Zero setup fee for the core gateway and add-on modules<\/li>\n<li>Defined chargeback fee, disclosed in writing<\/li>\n<li>T+1 settlement included at standard pricing, with T+0 priced explicitly<\/li>\n<li>Written refund MDR policy<\/li>\n<li>Full recurring billing fee schedule<\/li>\n<li>Method-wise success rate reporting in the monthly statement<\/li>\n<li>Uptime commitment and notification protocol for outages<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div style=\"background: #f9fbff; border-left: 4px solid #007BFF; padding: 22px 25px; margin: 30px 0; border-radius: 8px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: #333; line-height: 1.6;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin: 0 0 12px 0; color: #007bff; font-size: 20px; display: flex; align-items: center;\">Did You Know?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin: 0; font-size: 16px;\">Custom payment gateway pricing conversations typically begin above \u20b95 lakh monthly GMV. By \u20b91 crore, method-wise pricing should be on the table.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>When to Switch Payment Gateways vs Use Multiple Payment Gateways<\/h2>\n<p>The default question at \u20b91 crore is whether to switch. The better question is whether to switch, layer, or both.<\/p>\n<p>A full switch is justified when the current provider has chronically low success rates, opaque or growing hidden fees, weak settlement visibility, no method-wise reporting, no written refund MDR policy, slow incident response, or refuses to offer custom pricing at your scale. If a provider will not match a credibly cheaper, better-performing competitor offer at \u20b91 crore GMV, the cost of switching is usually outweighed within a quarter.<\/p>\n<p>Layering, also called payment orchestration, makes sense when failures cost more than fees, when bank-specific routing improves success rate, or when you want sustained negotiation leverage. Orchestration routes each transaction through the gateway most likely to succeed. The <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/payment-success-rate-tips-to-improve\">tips to improve payment success rate<\/a> cover the mechanics.<\/p>\n<p>The credible threat of shifting volume between two integrated gateways is the strongest negotiation lever once you cross \u20b91 crore. Switching alone gives you better terms once; layering gives you better terms continuously, plus better success rates and outage resilience.<\/p>\n<h2>Payment Gateway Pricing Contract Checklist<\/h2>\n<p>Use this as a clause-by-clause walk-through before signing or renewing.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Fee or term<\/th>\n<th>What to ask<\/th>\n<th>Why it matters at \u20b91 crore GMV<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Platform fee<\/td>\n<td>Method-wise breakdown for UPI, debit, credit, net banking, EMI, BNPL, international<\/td>\n<td>A blended rate hides where you are overpaying<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Annual maintenance charge<\/td>\n<td>Zero AMC in writing<\/td>\n<td>\u20b94,999 per year is \u20b9416 per month of pure overhead<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Setup fee<\/td>\n<td>Zero setup fee on core payment gateway and add-on modules<\/td>\n<td>Setup fees are almost always waived above \u20b95 lakh GMV<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Instant settlement fee<\/td>\n<td>Per-transaction rate, daily cap, any setup charge<\/td>\n<td>0.50% on \u20b91 crore is \u20b950,000 per month<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Refund MDR policy<\/td>\n<td>Written confirmation that MDR is not refunded, plus pre-capture void exceptions<\/td>\n<td>At 10% refund rate, this is \u20b920,000 per month<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Chargeback fee<\/td>\n<td>Per-dispute fee, disclosed in writing<\/td>\n<td>Non-refundable even on wins<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>NACH mandate fees<\/td>\n<td>Creation, rejection, retry, per-debit charges<\/td>\n<td>\u20b915 per rejection scales fast in subscription<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Messaging fees<\/td>\n<td>Per-SMS and per-WhatsApp rates, with opt-out for own stack<\/td>\n<td>\u20b90.30 per WhatsApp scales at high volume<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tokenization fees<\/td>\n<td>Per-token and per-cryptogram costs<\/td>\n<td>\u20b91.25 per token is material at scale<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>GST treatment<\/td>\n<td>18% on platform fee, not on gross sale<\/td>\n<td>Avoids inflated cost estimates<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Settlement cycle<\/td>\n<td>T+1 included, T+0 priced explicitly<\/td>\n<td>Working capital impact is real<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Success rate reporting<\/td>\n<td>Method-wise and bank-wise in monthly statement<\/td>\n<td>Cannot manage what is not measured<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Uptime commitment<\/td>\n<td>Target percentage and incident protocol<\/td>\n<td>Outages cost lakhs per hour<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Exit clause<\/td>\n<td>Performance-linked termination right<\/td>\n<td>Protects against degraded service<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>How Razorpay&#8217;s Pricing Structure Maps to TCO at \u20b91 Crore GMV<\/h2>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/payment-gateway\/\">Razorpay Payment Gateway<\/a> is structured around the TCO logic above. The headline transaction rate is one input; the absence of fixed fees and volume-based custom pricing above \u20b95 lakh monthly GMV are the others.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>TCO component<\/th>\n<th>Razorpay structure<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Annual maintenance charge<\/td>\n<td>\u20b90 on the core payment gateway product<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Setup fee<\/td>\n<td>\u20b90 on the core payment gateway product<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Custom pricing eligibility<\/td>\n<td>Available above \u20b95 lakh monthly GMV<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Method-wise pricing<\/td>\n<td>Supported across UPI, cards, net banking, EMI, BNPL<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>FAQs<\/h2>\n<h3 class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\"><strong>At what GMV do payment gateways offer custom pricing in India?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\">Custom pricing conversations typically begin above \u20b95 lakh monthly GMV. By \u20b91 crore, method-wise pricing \u2014 separate rates for UPI, debit cards, credit cards, EMI, and international cards \u2014 should be on the table. Public rate cards are designed for self-serve merchants under \u20b95 lakh\/month; above that threshold, providers model your risk profile and structure tiered rates that decline with volume.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\"><strong>How much does a 0.2% MDR reduction save at \u20b91 crore monthly GMV?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\">At \u20b91 crore monthly GMV, a 0.2 percentage point MDR reduction saves \u20b920,000 per month, or \u20b92.4 lakh per year. The \u20b924 lakh figure cited in some guides assumes \u20b910 crore monthly GMV. Walking into a negotiation with the wrong base figure undermines your position \u2014 the actual annual saving at \u20b91 crore from a small basis-point cut is \u20b92.4 lakh, which is meaningful when combined with other levers but modest on its own.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\"><strong>Is payment success rate more important than MDR when choosing a payment gateway?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\">At \u20b91 crore monthly GMV, yes \u2014 by a wide margin. A 5 percentage point improvement in payment success rate recovers \u20b95 lakh per month in additional collected revenue. A 0.2 percentage point MDR reduction saves \u20b920,000 per month. The success rate lever is roughly 25 times larger. A gateway offering 1.8% MDR with 85% success rate produces lower net realised revenue than one charging 2% MDR with 93% success rate \u2014 the 8 percentage point success gap costs approximately \u20b98 lakh\/month against a \u20b920,000 MDR saving.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\"><strong>What data should I prepare before renegotiating payment gateway pricing?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\">Build a 6-month data pack covering: monthly GMV and transaction count, payment method mix (UPI, debit, credit, net banking, EMI, international), success rate by method and issuing bank, refund rate and average refund timing, chargeback ratio and dispute outcomes, and current settlement cycle. Add two competing written quotes from other gateways. This converts the conversation from a rate enquiry to a risk-profile negotiation \u2014 the stronger position.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\"><strong>Should I switch payment gateways or use multiple gateways at \u20b91 crore GMV?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\">A full switch makes sense when your current provider has chronically low success rates, opaque fees, no method-wise reporting, or refuses custom pricing at your scale. Layering two gateways \u2014 payment orchestration \u2014 is better when failures cost more than fees or when bank-specific routing materially improves success rate. The credible threat of shifting volume between two integrated gateways is the strongest ongoing negotiation lever; switching alone improves terms once, layering improves them continuously.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\"><strong>What hidden payment gateway fees compound most at \u20b91 crore GMV?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\">Five categories matter most at scale. Refund MDR: at 10% refund rate and 2% MDR, non-reversal of fees on returned orders costs \u20b920,000\/month. Instant settlement: 0.50% on \u20b91 crore settled daily is \u20b950,000\/month. NACH mandate rejections: at \u20b915 per rejection plus GST, a 5% rejection rate on 10,000 mandates is \u20b97,500\/cycle. Chargeback fees: non-refundable even on merchant wins. Messaging fees: \u20b90.30 per WhatsApp message scales to lakhs at high notification volume. None of these appear in headline MDR comparisons.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\"><strong>What MDR rate should I target when renegotiating at \u20b91 crore monthly GMV?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\">The realistic target for domestic card transactions at \u20b91 crore GMV is 1.4% to 1.6%, down from the public rate of 1.9% to 2.0%. UPI platform fees should trend toward zero or near-zero given zero network MDR on bank-linked UPI. AMC and setup fees should both be waived \u2014 neither is defensible above \u20b95 lakh GMV. Instant settlement pricing, refund MDR policy, and chargeback fee schedule should all be disclosed in writing as part of the negotiation, not treated as separate conversations.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\"><strong>Does Razorpay offer custom pricing at \u20b91 crore monthly GMV?<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p class=\"font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal leading-[1.7]\">Yes. Razorpay offers custom pricing for merchants processing above \u20b95 lakh monthly GMV, available through the sales team. The standard rate card \u2014 2% domestic MDR, zero AMC, zero setup \u2014 already removes fixed-fee overhead that compounds at scale. Above \u20b91 crore, method-wise pricing is available on request, with rates structured around the merchant&#8217;s payment mix, chargeback ratio, and refund profile.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At \u20b91 crore in monthly gross merchandise value, payment gateway pricing stops being a line item and becomes a margin decision. A 0.2 percentage point cut in transaction rate saves \u20b920,000 a month. A five-point lift in payment success rate unlocks roughly \u20b95 lakh in collected revenue over the same period. Yet most merchants still<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":149,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[906],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-27012","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-payment-gateway"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27012","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/149"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27012"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27012\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27156,"href":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27012\/revisions\/27156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/razorpay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}