When an Indian manufacturer receives foreign investment or a freelancer plans to acquire property abroad, they engage in capital account transactions. Unlike routine trade payments, these transactions change ownership of assets across borders. FEMA defines them as any transaction that alters assets or liabilities outside India for residents or inside India for non-residents. Misclassification can result in RBI penalties of up to 300% of the transaction value or the freezing of funds. This guide explains FEMA rules, permitted transactions, and key reporting forms, such as the FC-GPR, to ensure compliance.

Key Takeaways

  • Capital account transactions, such as FDI or purchasing foreign property, change assets or liabilities outside India, unlike current account flows that relate to routine trade and operations.
  • Current account transactions are generally permitted, while capital account transactions are restricted unless explicitly allowed under Schedule I (Residents) and Schedule II (Non-Residents).
  • Accounting treatment does not always match FEMA classification; for instance, importing machinery may be capital expenditure in accounts but a current account transaction under FEMA.
  • Non-compliance attracts severe penalties, including fines up to 300% of the transaction value or ₹2 lakh if the amount cannot be quantified.
  • Timely reporting is mandatory, with forms such as FC-GPR required to be filed within 30 days of share allotment to avoid late fees.

What Defines a Capital Account Transaction?

FEMA compliance begins with understanding capital account transactions. Section 2(e) of FEMA, 1999, defines them as transactions that alter assets or liabilities, including contingent liabilities, outside India for residents or within India for non-residents. This legal definition emphasises changes in cross-border ownership rather than accounting classifications. Two core scenarios illustrate these transactions:

  • Indian residents altering foreign assets/liabilities: When you invest in foreign securities, buy property abroad, or take loans from overseas entities
  • Non-residents altering Indian assets/liabilities: When foreign investors acquire Indian company shares, purchase Indian property, or provide loans to Indian entities

Common examples include:

  • Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into Indian companies
  • Outward Direct Investment (ODI) by Indian entities
  • External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) from foreign lenders
  • Purchase or sale of immovable property across borders
  • Transfer of shares between residents and non-residents

Capital Account vs. Current Account Transactions: What is the Difference?

Understanding the distinction between capital and current account transactions is crucial for compliance, as it determines regulatory obligations and reporting requirements.

Capital transactions change ownership or debt relationships across borders, while current account transactions involve operational or income flows. Regulatory treatment also differs: capital account transactions follow a “prohibited unless permitted” framework (Section 6), whereas current account transactions are generally allowed under “permitted unless prohibited” rules (Section 5).

Feature Capital Account Current Account
Definition Alters cross-border assets/liabilities Covers trade, services, income flows
FEMA Section Section 6 Section 5
Regulatory Stance Prohibited unless permitted Permitted unless prohibited
Examples FDI, property purchase, ECB Export proceeds, service fees, interest
Reporting Strict forms (FC-GPR, FC-TRS) Standard banking documentation
Purpose Codes P-series codes S-series, I-series codes

Banks use Purpose Codes to classify transactions, determining whether they fall under capital account restrictions or qualify for current account freedoms.

Key Differences in Regulatory Treatment

The regulatory framework treats these transaction types fundamentally differently:

  • Current Account transactions under Section 5: Enjoy freely permissive status. You can receive export proceeds, pay for imports, or transfer service fees without seeking prior permissions.
  • Capital Account transactions under Section 6: Face restrictive controls. Every transaction requires either automatic permission under specific schedules or explicit RBI/Government approval.

Impact on Accounting vs. FEMA Reporting

Accounting principles often contradict FEMA classifications, creating confusion for businesses. Your balance sheet may show machinery purchase as ‘Capital Expenditure’ (CapEx). However, FEMA treats immediate payment for imported machinery as a Current Account transaction since no long-term cross-border liability exists.

This distinction matters because ‘Capital’ in balance sheets does not equal ‘Capital’ in FEMA. The settlement nature, not accounting treatment, determines classification.

The Regulatory Framework: FEMA Section 6

The distinction between capital and current accounts provides a basis for understanding the regulatory powers governing these flows. Section 6 forms the backbone of capital account regulation in India.

This section divides regulatory authority between the Reserve Bank of India and the Central Government based on transaction type. The framework prioritises preserving India’s foreign exchange reserves while facilitating legitimate business needs.

Powers of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)

RBI exercises exclusive control over debt-related capital flows:

  • Debt Instruments: All forms of borrowings, debentures, bonds, and debt securities
  • Foreign loans and overdrafts: Including External Commercial Borrowings (ECB)
  • Guarantees: Cross-border guarantee arrangements involving debt[
  • Setting limits: RBI determines borrowing caps, end-use restrictions, and all-in-cost ceilings.

Powers of the Central Government

The Central Government, in consultation with the RBI, regulates non-debt capital flows:

  • Non-Debt Instruments: Equity shares, preference shares, and convertible instruments
  • FDI policies: Sectoral caps, entry routes, and performance conditions
  • Immovable property: Rules for property acquisition by non-residents
  • Institutional investments: Portfolio investment limits and conditions

Which Capital Account Transactions are Permissible?

Regulation 3 of the FEMA (Permissible Capital Account Transactions) Regulations, 2000, establishes the framework.

These regulations create ‘white-lists’ through schedules based on residential status. Permissible transactions vary significantly between residents and non-residents, reflecting different risk profiles and policy objectives.

Schedule I: For Persons Resident in India

Indian residents enjoy automatic permission for specific capital flows:

  • Investment in foreign securities (ODI): Subject to prescribed limits and conditions
  • Foreign currency loans: Both raised in India and abroad, within RBI guidelines
  • Transfer of immovable property outside India: Under the Inheritance or the Liberalised Remittance Scheme
  • Export, import, and holding of currency: Within prescribed limits for travel and education
  • LRS remittances: Currently USD 250,000 per financial year for permitted purposes

Pro Tip: Track your LRS utilisation carefully. Banks report all remittances to the RBI, and exceeding the limits attracts penalties, even if done across multiple banks.

Schedule II: For Persons Resident Outside India

Non-residents receive different automatic permissions reflecting India’s foreign investment policies:

  • Investment in Indian securities: Including FDI and portfolio investments within sectoral limits
  • Acquisition of immovable property in India: Excluding agricultural land and plantations
  • Remittance of capital assets outside India: Subject to tax clearances and lock-in periods
  • Deposits between residents and non-residents: Within prescribed interest rate caps

Explore Razorpay’s Global Payment Solutions

Which Capital Account Transactions are Prohibited?

While schedules define permitted transactions, Regulation 4 explicitly bans certain activities regardless of the parties involved. These prohibitions protect domestic interests and prevent speculative activities.

Specific Banned Sectors and Activities

Five sectors face absolute prohibition for foreign investment:

  • Business of Chit Funds: Traditional rotating savings schemes remain exclusively domestic
  • Nidhi Companies: Mutual benefit societies operating among members only
  • Agricultural or plantation activities: Protecting rural livelihoods and food security
  • Real Estate business: Excluding township development and commercial construction projects
  • Trading in Transferable Development Rights (TDRs): Preventing speculation in development permissions

Restrictions on Residents of Specific Countries

Geographic restrictions add another compliance layer:

  • Nepal and Bhutan residents: Transactions often require special permission or INR settlement
  • High-risk jurisdictions: Face enhanced scrutiny based on FATF guidelines

Did You Know?

Despite close ties, capital transactions with Nepal and Bhutan face unique restrictions due to open border arrangements and currency agreements.

Real-World Scenarios: When ‘Capital’ Becomes ‘Current’

Prohibited sectors clarify what cannot happen, but grey areas persist where accounting logic contradicts FEMA classifications. Understanding these nuances prevents costly compliance errors.

The settlement nature, rather than the accounting treatment, often determines transaction classification. This principle confuses businesses when their capital expenditure is treated as a current account flow under FEMA.

The Machinery Import Example

Consider this common scenario and its regulatory treatment:

Scenario: An Indian textile manufacturer imports computerised looms from Germany worth ₹2,40,00,000

Accounting view: Capital Expenditure creating fixed assets on the balance sheet

FEMA view: Current Account Transaction when paid immediately through banking channels

Reasoning: No long-term foreign liability exists after payment settlement. The transaction merely exchanges foreign currency for goods without creating ongoing cross-border obligations.

Short-Term Banking Facilities

Trade finance creates another classification challenge:

Scenario: Availing 180-day supplier credit for raw material imports

Classification: Typically, the Current Account is part of ordinary business operations

Contrast: Multi-year External Commercial Borrowings for expansion remain in the Capital Account, requiring ECB compliance

Reporting and Compliance Requirements

Complex classification challenges make robust reporting even more critical. ‘Permissible’ never means ‘paperwork-free’ under FEMA.

The Foreign Investment Reporting and Management System (FIRMS) portal centralises compliance for most capital account transactions. Missing deadlines triggers Late Submission Fees that compound daily, making timely filing essential.

Form FC-GPR (Foreign Currency-Gross Provisional Return)

This form reports the creation of capital instruments for non-residents:

Purpose: Reporting issuance of shares, debentures, or preference shares to foreign investors

Trigger: Receipt of Foreign Direct Investment through banking channels

Deadline: Within 30 days of share allotment, not fund receipt

Form FC-TRS (Foreign Currency-Transfer of Shares)

Secondary market transactions require separate reporting:

Purpose: Recording transfer of capital instruments between residents and non-residents

Trigger: Share sale/purchase on or off stock exchanges

Deadline: Within 60 days of transfer or remittance receipt

Annual FLA Return

Ongoing compliance extends beyond transaction reporting:

Purpose: Annual Return on Foreign Liabilities and Assets consolidates the year’s position

Requirement: Mandatory for all Indian companies with any FDI or ODI exposure

Deadline: July 15th annually, covering the previous financial year

Best Practices for Managing Cross-Border Transactions

Compliance requirements demand systematic approaches to avoid Section 13 penalties. These can reach three times the transaction amount when quantifiable, or ₹2,00,000 when not.

Professional guidance becomes invaluable for complex transactions. Chartered Accountants provide essential valuation reports while ensuring compliance with documentary requirements. Your selection of banking partners significantly impacts FIRC issuance efficiency.

Ensuring Proper Documentation

Maintain these essential documents in audit-ready condition:

  • Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates (FIRC): Official proof for every capital inflow
  • KYC documents: Complete records of the foreign investor/lender identity
  • Board Resolutions: Formal approval for each capital transaction
  • Valuation certificates: Supporting pricing for share transfers

Avoiding Purpose Code Errors

Purpose Code accuracy prevents unnecessary regulatory scrutiny:

  • Verify codes before submission: Banks cannot modify codes after processing
  • Incorrect codes trigger RBI queries: Routine trade flagged as capital flows creates compliance burdens
  • Review bank advice regularly: Catch errors before they compound

Simplify Cross-Border Compliance with Razorpay MoneySaver Export Account

Streamline your cross-border documentation with automated electronic Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates (FIRC) for every transaction, ensuring you remain audit-ready for FEMA requirements without manual paperwork.

Save up to 50% on international bank transfer costs with a dedicated account that supports SWIFT, ACH, and SEPA payments from over 160 countries, reducing the financial burden of cross-border operations.

Mitigate the risk of ‘Purpose Code’ errors and compliance flags by using a platform specifically designed to handle the nuances of international settlements for Indian businesses.

Simplify Cross-Border Compliance with Razorpay

Get automated eFIRC for every transaction, save up to 50% on transfer costs, and reduce purpose code errors-stay audit-ready for FEMA with smoother international settlements.

Explore Razorpay’s MoneySaver Export Account 

Conclusion

Capital account transactions under FEMA require careful navigation between permitted schedules and prohibited territories. The fundamental principle remains: capital accounts build long-term cross-border value while current accounts manage daily operations.

Success demands adherence to Schedules I and II while avoiding the prohibited sectors under Regulation 4. Leverage expert guidance and automated platforms to transform FEMA complexity into a competitive advantage for global growth.

FAQs

1. What is the primary difference between capital and current account transactions under FEMA?

Capital account transactions involve assets or liabilities outside India, such as purchasing foreign property, whereas current account transactions cover operational flows, such as trade payments, interest, and remittances.

2. Is importing machinery considered a capital account transaction?

Not necessarily. Although accounting may treat it as ‘capital expenditure,’ FEMA often classifies it as a current account transaction if payment is settled immediately without creating a long-term cross-border liability.

3. What are the penalties for violating FEMA capital account regulations?

Violations under Section 13 can attract civil penalties up to three times the sum involved if quantifiable, or up to ₹2 lakh if not, along with daily fines for continuing defaults.

4. When is the deadline to file Form FC-GPR?

Form FC-GPR must be filed with the RBI within 30 days of allotting shares to a foreign investor to report the issuance of capital instruments.

5. Is a Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate (FIRC) mandatory?

Yes, FIRCs are essential as they serve as official proof of inward foreign currency remittance, required for tax audits and FEMA compliance.

6. Can Indian residents freely invest in properties outside India?

Residents can invest in foreign property, but such investments are subject to the limits and conditions of the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS), currently capping remittances at USD 250,000 per financial year.

Author

Adarsh is a fintech enthusiast with over five years of experience in content writing and a background in the banking industry. With a growing specialization in cross-border payments, he brings a sharp understanding of financial systems and a storyteller’s eye to complex fintech narratives.